Aspen Hill Rehabiliation & Healthcare Center
Haverhill, Massachusetts · CCN 225404
36 surveys since 2011, 16 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 142
- Surveys
- 36
- Harm or worse
- 16
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 146
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES
- County
- Essex
- Medicare-certified since
- 1990
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 96 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Massachusetts.
Last survey on record
Jan 8, 2026
305 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.64 | 3.59 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.56 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 46.0% | 34.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $134,274 across 3 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G47.8% | H12.0% | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3262.7% | E1325.5% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B12.0% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6563×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F8423×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F6582×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F6772×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F6862×
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Aspen Hill Rehabiliation & Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, patternF689Jan 25, 2024
Based on observation, record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and ensure an environment free from accidents and hazards, for two Residents (#99 and #92) out of a total sample of 34 Residents. Specifically: 1.) For Resident #99, who was assessed by nursing to be a high risk for falls, the facility failed to ensure he/she received adequate supervision to prevent accidents when he/she experienced 13 falls over a span of 51 days, with two of those falls resulting in injuries which required 6 staples (12/16/23) and 12 sutures (12/29/23). […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF656Mar 11, 2025
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #3), whose comprehensive plan of care and Care Kardex (a summary of the resident's care needs, utilized by Certified Nurse Aides) indicated he/she required staff assistance with ambulation, the Facility failed to ensure staff consistently implemented and followed interventions related to ambulation, per his/her plan of care. On 02/11/25, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #2 saw Resident #3 ambulating by him/herself, and although she thought he/she required staff supervision with ambulation, CNA #2 did not provide him/her with supervision or assistance (per the plan of care) with ambulation. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Mar 11, 2025
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #3), who was assessed by nursing as being at risk for falls, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with the necessary level of staff assistance to prevent an incident resulting in an injury. On 02/11/25, Certified Nurse Aide #2, who was familiar with and had provided care to Resident #3, observed him/her ambulating alone, but did not provide or get another staff member to assist or supervise him/her. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Jan 16, 2025
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to keep one Resident (#1) free from abuse out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, an allegation of abuse was made by Resident #95 and filed as a grievance, subsequently allowing the accused certified nursing aide to continue working, which led to the physical abuse of Resident #1. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Missapropriation Prevention Program, undated, indicated the following: - Identify and investigate all possible incidents of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or misapporopriation of resident property. - Investigate and report any allegations within timeframes required by federal requirements. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF610Jan 16, 2025
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to 1a. investigate an allegation of potential abuse for one Resident (#95), which 1b. failed to keep Resident (#1) free from abuse, out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, Resident #95 reported to staff having been rough handled by a certified nursing aide. The report was not thoroughly investigated, which allowed the accused certified nursing aide to continue working, and eventually abuse Resident #1. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation- Reporting and Investigating, revised September 2022, indicates the following: -All reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident… […]
Read 32 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 32 of 142 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 8, 2026Standard5 findings
- Mar 11, 2025Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Jan 16, 2025Standard22 findings · 2 harm
- Jan 25, 2024Standard22 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 19, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Nov 17, 2022Standard10 findings
- Aug 31, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Nov 16, 2021Complaint1 finding
Show the 28 earlier surveys
- Apr 20, 2021Standard9 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 8, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Nov 30, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Sep 16, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Aug 20, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Aug 10, 2020Infection control4 findings
- Nov 22, 2019Complaint2 findings
- May 2, 2019Standard8 findings
- Mar 26, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Mar 21, 2018Standard3 findings
- Aug 10, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Jan 18, 2017Standard2 findings
- Dec 22, 2016Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
- Nov 23, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Jan 13, 2016Standard4 findings
- Jul 13, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Oct 23, 2014Standard1 finding
- Sep 29, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Sep 25, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Jun 5, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Oct 9, 2013—1 finding
- Sep 4, 2013—7 findings
- Aug 7, 2013—1 finding
- Jul 11, 2013—1 finding
- Feb 4, 2013—1 finding
- Aug 23, 2012—7 findings · 2 harm
- Jan 20, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 30, 2011—11 findings · 3 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Haverhill Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterHaverhill4 harm findings
- Vantage at West Springfield LLCWest Springfield8 harm findings
- Parsons Hill Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterWorcester3 harm findings
- Blaire House of TewksburyTewksbury3 harm findings
- Hadley Pointe Nursing Rehab & CareHadley8 harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction