Deficiency Index

Blaire House of Tewksbury

Tewksbury, Massachusetts · CCN 225548

26 surveys since 2010, 20 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
141
Surveys
26
Harm or worse
20
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse20

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file20/26

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
131
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
ELDER SERVICES
County
Middlesex
Medicare-certified since
1992

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
2
Quality measures
1

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 96 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Massachusetts.

Last survey on record

Apr 30, 2026

193 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.243.59
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.49—
Annual nurse turnover50.8%34.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$71,902 across 2 penalties
Special focus
SFF Candidate

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG22.9%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD4564.3%E2231.4%F11.4%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 70 of the 141 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6564×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F5503×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6073×

    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.

  • F6773×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Blaire House of Tewksbury, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, patternF692Oct 17, 2023

    Based on observation, record review and interview for three Residents (#37, #90 and #87) of 26 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were implemented to ensure acceptable parameters of nutritional status. Specifically: 1. for Resident #37, the facility failed to ensure a significant weight loss was verified and assessed resulting in a risk of malnutrition. 2. for Resident #90, the facility failed to implement his/her nutritional care plan resulting in a significant weight loss. 3. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Dec 17, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary treatment, services, or interventions to promote healing and prevent new ulcers from developing for two Residents (#111 and #32) out of 30 total sampled residents. Specifically:1a.) For Resident #111, the facility failed to prevent a new coccyx wound from developing and worsening by not ensuring the Resident's air mattress was inflated, notifying the physician of a new wound to obtain treatment orders and implementing a wound treatment without a physician's order.1b.) For Resident #111, the facility failed to prevent an existing heel wound from worsening by not assessing and monitoring the wound, not implementing physician orders for wound treatment and not following through with a referral to the… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Dec 17, 2025

    Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to keep two Residents (#12 and #82) free from accidents out of a total sample of 30 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to:1) Ensure Resident #12 was supervised during waking hours resulting in a fall with major injury.2) Ensure a fall intervention for alarm when in bed was implemented for Resident #82 after he/she had recently sustained a fall. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Quality Assurance & Performance Improvement Falls Policy and Procedure, dated as revised 9/2025, indicated the following: The interdisciplinary team shall review potential contributing/causative factors associated with the fall and implement individualized interventions accordingly. 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Oct 17, 2023

    Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to employ a Registered Dietician to assess the nutrition needs of all residents on all units as required resulting in risk for malnutrition. , Findings include: 1. Review of the Registered Dietician Job Description (sic.) indicated the following responsibilities of the Registered Dietician (RD): -Provide consultation and education to facilities staff regarding resident dietary needs and requirements. -Provide routine and periodic assessment of the facilities total dietary program -Participate in resident care planning, MDS (minimum data sets), assessments, monitoring, evaluating or any other required documentation in accordance with facilities policies -Meet with the residents to determine individual likes or dislikes -Participate… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Dec 17, 2025

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility 1) failed to provide a dignified existence for one Resident (#89) out of a total sample of 30 residents and 2a.) failed to provide a dignified dining experience for one Resident (#38) out of a total sample of 30 residents and 2b.) on two of three units. Specifically:1. For Resident #89 the facility failed to ensure privacy during incontinent care.2a. For Resident #38 the staff removed his/her utensils and guided him/her to eat syrup covered pancakes with his/her hands.2b. In the unit dining rooms residents waited for long periods to be served after their table mates were served, staff stood while feeding and staff referred to residents as feeders, rather than by their name. […]

Read 36 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 36 of 141 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 30, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 17, 2025Standard24 findings · 2 harm
  • Jan 29, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 23, 2024Standard16 findings
  • Oct 17, 2023Standard26 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 28, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 1, 2022Standard10 findings
  • Jan 5, 2022Complaint2 findings
Show the 18 earlier surveys
  • Jan 13, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Oct 15, 2020Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
  • Nov 1, 2019Standard4 findings
  • Dec 13, 2018Standard6 findings
  • Aug 30, 2018Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Sep 5, 2017Standard4 findings · 2 harm
  • Aug 10, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Dec 7, 2015Complaint5 findings · 5 harm
  • May 28, 2015Standard3 findings
  • Nov 6, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 25, 2014Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Oct 21, 2013Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 24, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jun 21, 2012—5 findings
  • Oct 21, 2011—1 finding
  • Jun 21, 2011—11 findings · 1 harm
  • May 31, 2011—1 finding
  • Sep 17, 2010—1 finding · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction