Deficiency Index

Greensville Health and Rehabilitation Center

Emporia, Virginia · CCN 495199

14 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
115
Surveys
14
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file11/14

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
65
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Emporia City · rural
Medicare-certified since
1989

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 33 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Virginia.

Last survey on record

Jul 28, 2023

1,200 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.073.46
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.62—
Annual nurse turnover45.7%55.1%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG25.7%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2571.4%E822.9%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 35 of the 115 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6842×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6862×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

  • F7912×

    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Greensville Health and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF583Jul 16, 2026

    Based on observation, staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to protect the residents' rights to have secure and confidential personal and medical records for four Residents (Residents #2, #19, #10 and #3) in a survey sample of 26 residents. The findings included:1. For Resident #2 (R2) the facility failed to protect the residents' rights to have secure and confidential personal and medical records by displaying a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) band on the wall over the head of the bed visible to the public and other residents. On [DATE], during initial rounds R2 was observed in bed, a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) band was posted on a cork board on the wall over the bed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684Jul 16, 2026

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure resident receive a physician ordered wound treatment in accordance with professional standards for one of twenty-six residents in the survey sample (Resident R16.Findings include:The facility staff failed to transcribe and apply the wound care treatment ordered on 6/25/26 by the Wound Specialist Nurse Practitioner to R16's right foot wound.R16 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, anemia, atrial fibrillation, major depressive disorder, diabetic mellitus type 2, dementia congestive heart failure and chronic… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF755Jul 16, 2026

    Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to provide routine scheduled medications to three residents in a survey sample of twenty-six residents (R8, R3 and R62).Findings include:The facility staff failed to administer scheduled medications due to medications not being available. 1.R8 was admitted to the facility 2/26/26 with diagnoses to include but not limited osteoarthritis, anemia, wedge compression fracture T7-T8 vertebrae and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. R8's most recent MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set) with an assessment Reference Date 6/2/26 coded R8 in Section C. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF760Jul 16, 2026

    Based on interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the faciity staff failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 Resident in survey sample of 26 residents.For Resident #76 (R76) the facility staff failed to ensure a resident diagnosed with dementia, did not pull his PICC line out and failed to have the appropriate antibiotics available for administration. R76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to interstitial pulmonary disease, personal history of venous thrombosis and embolism, type 2 diabetes, hypertensive heart disease, atherosclerotic heart disease of coronary artery, old myocardial infarction, UTI with sepsis, obstructive and reflux uropathy. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF571Jul 28, 2023

    Based on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff charged the Resident and deducted from their patient trust account, funds in excess what was due to the facility for three Residents (Resident #17, #37 and #23), in a survey sample of 6 Residents reviewed with trust accounts. This happened on five occasions. The findings included: 1. For Resident #17, the facility staff withdrew $153 in excess of what was due towards the cost of care on two occasions, March 2023, and May 2023. On 7/27/23, Surveyor C received and reviewed the Resident trust account statement for Resident #17 for the year of 2023. During this review it was noted that on March 3, 2023, $1,129 was deducted/withdrawn from the Resident's trust account for Care Cost Auto WDL [automatic withdrawal]. […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 115 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 16, 2026Standard7 findings
  • Jul 28, 2023Standard17 findings
  • Jul 21, 2022Infection control3 findings
  • Apr 23, 2021Standard3 findings
  • Sep 22, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Oct 12, 2018Standard and complaint16 findings · 2 harm
  • Sep 13, 2017Standard3 findings
  • Sep 9, 2016Standard17 findings · 1 harm
Show the 6 earlier surveys
  • Oct 15, 2015Standard8 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 11, 2014Standard12 findings
  • Jan 7, 2014—2 findings
  • Aug 29, 2013—9 findings
  • Sep 27, 2012—5 findings
  • Aug 4, 2011—12 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction