Every finding on record at Good Shepherd Home Raker Center

Based on observation, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner in the dietary department.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Food and Nutrition Services Department Long Term Care Policy and Procedure Manual, last reviewed July 30, 2026, revealed that staff were to mark ready-to-eat foods with a discard date at the time of opening or preparation. Observations during the kitchen tour on August 11, 2026, at 9:28 a.m., revealed the following: In a reach-in refrigerator, there was an open carton of deli salad and four pre-poured drinks that had no label or date. On August 11, 2026 at 9:50 a.m., the Dietary Manager confirmed that the deli salad and pre-poured drinks should have been labeled and dated. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management.

Based on clinical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were implemented for one of 22 sampled residents. (Resident 15)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 15 had diagnoses that included cerebral palsy, epilepsy, and a history of cancer resulting in surgical removal of the left breast (mastectomy). A physician's order dated July 11, 2024, directed staff to avoid using the left arm to measure blood pressure to avoid possible complications from the mastectomy. Review of Resident 15's clinical record revealed that the left arm was used to measure blood pressure once in February, twice in March, twice in May, and once in June 2026. In an interview on August 11, 2026 at 1:12 p.m., Resident 15 stated that she preferred her blood pressure be taken on the right arm to avoid discomfort. In an interview on August 13, 2026, at 8:52 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that the resident's physician's orders were not followed. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.

Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure each resident was free from physical abuse which resulted in physical injuries of abrasions and ecchymosis for one of six sampled residents. (Resident 1) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Identification and Reporting of Suspected Adult and Older Adult Abuse, last reviewed September 2025, revealed the purpose of the policy was to protect the health, welfare, and well-being of residents. The policy applied to all staff of the Good [NAME] Rehabilitation Network. Abuse was defined as the occurrence of the infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. A caretaker was defined as an individual that had assumed responsibility for the provision of care. Patients had the right to be free from all forms of abuse. Clinical record review revealed Resident 1 had diagnoses that included Hemiplegia (complete or severe paralysis of one entire side of the body), following a stroke affecting the left dominant side, functional Quadriplegia (paralysis affecting all four limbs and the torso), Ataxia (neurological term used to describe a lack of voluntary muscle coordination resulting in unsteady movements), Aphasia (neurological communication disorder that impairs your ability to speak and write), Chronic Respiratory Failure, Depression (serious mental health condition, most commonly causing ongoing sadness, low energy, and a loss of interest in life), gastrostomy status (surgical opening through the stomach used to deliver nutrition, fluids and medication directly), and tracheostomy status (surgically created opening in the windpipe through the front of the neck). Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (periodic assessment of the resident's current status), dated April 29, 2026, revealed Resident 1 was alert and oriented and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. Review of Resident 1's care plan identified Resident 1 had limited physical mobility related to history of stroke with impairment in flexibility, strength, and motor control. Resident 1 was dependent on staff for dressing, personal hygiene, and incontinence care. There was an intervention for staff to provide assistance for all functional tasks in and out of bed. Further review of the care plan also identified that the resident had bowel incontinence. There was an intervention for him to wear incontinence products. Review of facility documentation dated July 11, 2026, revealed Resident 1 was non-verbal but used a letter board to facilitate communication. Resident 1 was identified as being able understand speech and being understood with the use of the letter board. Resident 1 was noted as a reliable historian with no history of confabulation or confusion per the medical record and staff interview. Further review of facility documentation revealed on July 11, 2026, at 7:30 a.m., a nurse aide (NA 1) went into Resident 1's room to provide care. NA 1 observed dried blood on his face over the left eyebrow and immediately reported the observation to Registered Nurse (RN) 2. RN 2 did a skin assessment and observed other areas on the resident's neck and chest. RN 2 noted that there was an abrasion (superficial injury where the topmost layer of skin, the epidermis, was rubbed or scraped off) on his left temple and scratches/red marks on his chest. Staff began to question Resident 1 to which he reported to staff of a nurse (RN 1) coming into the room to complete care at 3:00 a.m. on July 11, 2026. Review of the facility investigation report revealed Resident 1 told RN 1 she was hurting him and he tried to push her away. Resident 1 then stated to a staff member that RN 1 pinched him and hit him on the left side of his face and neck. Further review of facility documentation dated July 11, 2026, revealed the Nursing Home Administrator interviewed Resident 1. Resident 1 confirmed the incident of RN 1 coming into the room at 3:00 a.m. to provide incontinence care but it had hurt and he pushed her away. Resident 1 stated, RN 1 hit him and pinched him on the left side of his face and neck. He further indicated RN 1 held him down with her weight and her arms. Review of investigative statements revealed Resident 1 reported the sequence of events to numerous staff during interviews which led the facility to determine, Resident 1's sequence of events to be credible. Review of investigative statements dated July 11, 2026, revealed the following: On July 11, 2026, at 12:00 p.m., RN 3 a 7:00 p.m., to 7 :00 a.m., nurse indicated Resident 1 used the communication board to tell her that RN 1 was providing incontinence care and it hurt. Resident 1 stated he tried to defend himself but RN 1 went crazy and she pinched and punched me. On July 11, 2026, at 1:00 p.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1, a nurse assigned to 11 :00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. shift, revealed Resident 1 stated multiple times it was RN 1 who caused the injuries and it happened at 3:00 a.m. LPN 1 noted Resident 1 had clotted blood on the left side of his eyebrow, a scratched area on the left side of his neck, and superficial scratches on three different areas of his left upper chest. On July 11, 2026, at 1:30 p.m., RN 4, a nurse assigned to 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. shift, said that Resident 1 used his communication board to state that RN 1 was by herself when she pinched and punched him. Resident 1 also stated that RN 1 put her weight on him when he was awake at 3:00 a.m. Review of a nurse practitioner note dated July 13, 2026, revealed that the resident had acute abrasions noted to the area above the left eyebrow, left lateral neck, and left upper anterior chest, as well as a small area of ecchymosis (bruising) to the left clavicle (bone that connects your shoulder blade to your breastbone). At that time, Resident 1 reported that he had mild tenderness to the left cheekbone. Resident 1 again stated that RN 1 hit him on the head, pinched him, and put her body weight on the left side of his body. Interview conducted on July 21, 2026, at 1:40 p.m., with Resident 1 who used the communication board to indicate RN 1 abused him during the night and hurt him. In an interview on July 21, 2026, at 10:05 a.m., the Director of Nursing revealed the facility substantiated physical abuse, and RN 1's employment was terminated. Based on the above findings, the facility failed to ensure that Resident 1 was free from physical abuse which resulted in injury of abrasions and ecchymosis. 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 201.18(b)(1) Management 201.29(a) Resident rights 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services

Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from potential chemical restraints for one of five sampled residents who were ordered psychotropic medications. (Resident 26) Findings include:Clinical record review revealed that Resident 26 had diagnoses that included mood disorder and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired and had been administered an anti-anxiety medication. On June 16, 2025, a physician ordered staff to administer an anti-anxiety medication, (alprazolam), every eight hours as needed for anxiety and agitated behaviors. There was no date in the order that indicated when staff was to stop administering the as needed medication. Review of Resident 26's Medication Administration Record revealed that staff had administered the alprazolam 21 times in July 2025, 17 times in August 2025, and 17 times in September 2025. There was no documented evidence that the physician had re-evaluated continued use beyond 14 days of the as needed anti-anxiety medication. In an interview on September 23, 2025, at 8:50 a.m., the Administrator stated that there had been no date added to the order that indicated when staff were to stop administering the anti-anxiety medication. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.

Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed to accurately reflect the residents' current status for three of 20 sampled residents. (Residents 1, 2, and 7) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included cerebral atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease. A physician's order dated July 1, 2025, directed staff to administer an anti-platelet medication (clopidogrel bisulfate). Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident was administered an anti-coagulant medication during the review period, not an anti-platelet medication. The MDS inaccurately reflected the use of an anti-coagulant medication. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 2 had diagnoses that included peripheral artery disease and depression. A physician's order dated October 9, 2023, directed staff to administer an anti-platelet medication (clopidogrel bisulfate). Review of the MDS assessments dated June 12, 2025, and August 28, 2025, revealed that the resident was administered an anti-coagulant medication during the review period, not an anti-platelet medication. The MDS assessments inaccurately reflected the use of an anti-coagulant medication. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 7 had diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus and adjustment disorder. A physician's order dated November 23, 2021, directed staff to administer an anti-depressant medication (sertraline). Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident was not administered an antidepressant medication and that the resident had received a dose of insulin during the review period. Review of Resident 7's Medication Administration Record for August 2025 revealed that the resident did not receive any insulin and was administered an antidepressant medication in the during the review period. The MDS inaccurately reflected administration of insulin and non-use of an antidepressant medication. In an interview on September 23, 2025, at 9:42 a.m., the Registered Nurse Assessment Coordinator confirmed that Resident 1's, 2's, and 7's, MDS assessments were inaccurate and did not reflect the residents' current status.

Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that addressed each resident's needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment for two of 20 sampled residents. (Residents 16 and 36)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included adjustment disorder. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Care Area Assessment (CAA) summary dated March 20, 2025, noted that the resident's psychotropic drug use was to be addressed in the care plan. Review of the medication administration records for March through September 2025, revealed the resident received an antidepressant (sertraline), which was classified as a psychotropic drug, during the review period. There was no documented evidence that interventions to address Resident 16's psychotropic drug use were included in the current care plan. In an interview on September 22, 2025, at 3:20 p.m., Registered Nurse 1 (RN1) confirmed there was no documented evidence that the psychotropic drug use was addressed in the Resident's 16 current care plan. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included spastic quadriplegia cerebral palsy and seizure disorder. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident received oxygen through her nose while she was a resident. A physician's order dated September 9, 2021, instructed staff to apply oxygen at two liters per minute through a nasal cannula every night. Review of the treatment administration record for September 2025 revealed that the resident received oxygen every night. There was no documented evidence that the use of oxygen was included in the resident's current care plan. In an interview on September 23, 2025, at 9:45 a.m., RN2 confirmed that there was no documented evidence that oxygen was addressed on Resident 36's current care plan. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.

Based on observation and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to store and serve food under sanitary conditions in the kitchen. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen on August 20, 2024, at 10:15 a.m. revealed the following: There were two fruit flies in the food preparation area. There was a large fly on the cold preparation station. There was a pan of chicken on the same preparation station. The plastic wrap on the pan did not fully cover the pan and the chicken was open to air. There was an uncovered garbage can by the coffee preparation station. There was cheese in the reach in refrigerator with a use by date of August 18, 2024. There was a cup used to scoop thickener powder that was stored in the container, in direct contact with the thickener. Observation of the tray line service on August 21, 2024, at 11:10 a.m., revealed the following: Dietary Employee 1 (DE 1) was wearing gloves and operating the tray line. On multiple occasions, DE 1 turned away from the tray line and obtained food items from the refrigerator. DE 1 returned to the tray line and continued assembling resident meals, which included touching ready to eat foods without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene. There was a cooler that contained items for meal service, which included yogurt, a potentially hazardous food item. The door to the cooler was propped open during tray line service. Observation of the thermometer in the cooler at 11:40 a.m., revealed that the internal temperature was above proper refrigeration and cold holding temperature of 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and had reached 55 degrees F. There was a second cooler that contained juice and thickened beverages. The cooler was also kept open during meal service, there was no thermometer observed in the second cooler. Review of facility temperature logs revealed that food temperatures were to be monitored and recorded when the food items were cooked and while they were held for service. Review of temperature logs for August 2024, revealed the following: There was no evidence that staff monitored the holding temperatures for the breakfast meal on August 1 through 21, 2024. There was no evidence that staff monitored the holding temperatures for the lunch meal on August 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 14, 16, 17, 18, and 19, 2024. There was no evidence that staff monitored the holding temperatures for the dinner meal on August 3 and 4, 2024. 28 Pa. Code 201.18 (b)(3)(e)(2.1) Management.

Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a call bell was accessible for one of 20 sampled residents. (Resident 53) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 53 had diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis (damage to the nerves), quadriplegia (paralysis that affects all limbs of the body), and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident had no cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living. Review of the care plan revealed that staff was to ensure that the resident's call bell was within reach at all times. On August 20, 2024, at 1:07 p.m., Resident 53 was observed in her wheelchair in her room. The resident stated she wanted assistance to go back to bed. The call bell was placed on top of the resident's bed. The resident stated that the call bell was difficult to reach when it was on top of her bed. On August 21, 2024, at 12:51 p.m., the resident was observed in her room in her wheelchair. The call bell was not visible and the resident stated that she did not know where it was located. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.

Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to timely complete and transmit Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for three of 20 sampled residents. (Residents 32, 48, 67) Findings include: The Long Term Care Facility RAI User's Manual which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required MDS assessments, (mandated assessments of a residents' abilities and care needs), dated October 2019, indicated that annual, quarterly, and admission assessments were to be completed and transmitted electronically to the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid services (CMS) no later than 14 days after the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) which refers to the last day of the assessment observation period. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 32 had a quarterly MDS assessment, dated July 11, 2024, with an ARD of July 26, 2024, noted as still in progress and had not yet been completed or transmitted as per the time requirements. This quarterly assessment was overdue and had not been completed within the required time frame. Clinical record review revealed that Residents 48 and 67 had annual MDS assessments, dated July 15, 2024, with an ARD of July 24, 2024, noted as still in progress and had not yet been completed or transmitted as per the time requirements. These annual assessments were overdue and had not been completed within the required time frame.

Based on clinical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were implemented for two of 20 sampled residents. (Residents 50, 61) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 50 had diagnoses that included myotonic muscular dystrophy (genetic disorder that causes progressive muscle loss), congestive heart failure, and respiratory failure. A physician's order dated July 22, 2024, directed staff to weigh the resident every week on Mondays due to congestive heart failure and weight loss. There was no evidence that staff attempted to weigh the resident on July 29, 2024, and August 5, 12, and 19, 2024. In an interview on August 22, 2024, at 12:38 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that there was no evidence that staff weighed the resident per physician's order. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 61 had diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis (damage to the nerves), quadriplegia (paralysis that affects all limbs of the body), neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and depression. The resident used a urinary catheter (a tube used to drain urine from the bladder). In an interview on August 20, 2024, at 12:30 p.m., the resident stated that she occasionally had pain to the catheter insertion site. She stated she was to see a urologist but has not yet had an appointment. A physician's order dated July 15, 2024, directed staff to consult urology for the resident's catheter tube site pain. There was no evidence that staff scheduled the urologist appointment. In an interview on August 22, 2024, at 11:26 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that staff did not schedule the urologist appointment, per the physician's order. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.

Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food under sanitary conditions in the kitchen. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen on October 11, 2023, at 9:05 a.m. revealed two bottles of thickened water with a use by date of August 2, 2023, and September 2, 2023. There were four bottles of thickened prune juice with use by dates of October 8, 2023, and two bottles of thickened prune juice with use by dates of September 25, 2023. There was an accumulation of a brown substance on the handle of the meat slicer. In the walk-in refrigerator, there were eight half gallons of milk with use by dates of October 6, 2023. In the second walk-in refrigerator, there was a container of pickles dated October 2, 2023, and a container of olives dated October 1, 2023. There was a tray of two boxes of raw bacon stored over ready to eat hard boiled eggs. In the reach-in refrigerator, there were three wrapped blocks of sliced cheese that were not in the original packaging and not labeled or dated. There was an unidentified food substance that was not in the original packaging that was not labeled or dated. In an interview at the time of the kitcehn tour the Director of Dining Services confirmed that the items should have been labeled and dated. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3)(e)(2.1) Management.

Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a comfortable, homelike environment for residents, staff and public on two of three nursing units. ([NAME] 3 and [NAME] 4) Findings include: Observation on October 11, 2023, at 10:22 a.m., revealed that the walls throughout the [NAME] 3 nursing unit were marred and scratched above and below the handrails, and the panels on the doors to resident rooms were also marred and scratched. The door jams to the main resident areas were marred and slightly damaged. Observations on October 11 and 12, 2023, at various times throughout the day, revealed that the lower half of the walls throughout the [NAME] 4 nursing unit were marred and scratched. The panels on the doors to resident rooms were marred, and the door jams to the main resident areas and the elevator doors had chipped paint and were slightly damaged. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the walls were marred and scratched. In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was exposed drywall with large areas of chipped paint near the bathroom. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the walls were marred with chipped paint and there was crumbled drywall in the corner near the bathroom. In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was crumbled drywall at the base of the wall. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the walls were marred with chipped paint, the sink countertop was chipped in several spots and the rubber baseboard molding around the room had multiple holes. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the base of the wall had crumbled drywall. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3)(e)(2.1) Management.

Based on clinical record review, observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services and treatment to prevent further limitations in range of motion for one of six sampled residents with limitations in range of motion. (Resident 72) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 72 had diagnoses of hemiplegia, (paraplegia), of the left non-dominant side after a stroke, and dementia. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident had memory impairment, was totally dependent on staff for dressing, and had impairment in range of motion on both sides of her upper and lower extremities. Review of an occupational therapy screen dated July 17, 2023, revealed that the resident was to wear a left upper extremity comfy orthosis, (hand splint), when she was out of bed. A current physician order wad for the resident to wear a left upper extremity hand splint when she was out of bed. Observation on October 11, 2023, at 11:00 a.m., 1:07 p.m., and 1:22 p.m., revealed that the resident was out of bed, dressed and seated in her wheelchair. She did not have the left upper extremity hand splint in place as recommended by occupational therapy and as ordered by the physician. In an interview on October 13, 2023, at 9:14 a.m., the Administrator confirmed that the splint was to be in place as ordered by the physician. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.

Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to dispose of trash and refuse properly. Findings include: Observation of the trash compactor area on October 11, 2023, at 9:40 a.m., revealed an accumulation of debris that included gloves, cups, a plastic lid, paper items, a beverage carton, and a plastic syringe. FR 483.60(i) Food Safety RequirementsPreviously cited 11/10/22 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management.

Based on observation and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a reasonable accommodation of needs for one of five sampled residents. (Resident 1) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included depression and hemiplegia (paralysis) to the left side. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident was totally dependent on staff for activities of daily living. Review of the care plan revealed that the resident was incontinent of bowel and the intervention was for staff to take the resident to the toilet at the same time each day, which was typically after breakfast and lunch. On May 4, 2023, at 12:16 p.m., Resident 1 was observed out of bed in the wheelchair after the lunch meal. The resident rang the call bell and stated she needed to go to the bathroom. At 12:17 p.m., Nurse Aide 1 (NA 1) entered the resident's room and deactivated the call bell. The resident was observed at 12:28 p.m., seated in the wheelchair in her room. The resident stated staff had not yet provided assistance. At 12:40 p.m., Resident 1 was observed still in her wheelchair in the doorway to her room. The resident asked NA 2 for assistance. NA 2 stated, I can't, I don't have time. At 12:47 p.m., Resident 1 was observed in her room in her wheelchair. The resident stated that staff had not yet provided assistance in response to her initial request. She was not assisted with toileting after lunch per her care plan. At 12:57 p.m., staff was observed assisting Resident 1 with toileting, over 40 minutes after the resident rang the call bell and asked for assistance. CFR 483.10 (e)(3) Accommodation of needs and preferences previously cited 8/19/22 28 Pa. Code 201.29(j) Resident rights. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.

Based on clinical record review and resident interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide showers and bathing as scheduled/preferred to eight of 21 sampled residents. (Residents 24, 27, 34, 37, 44, 51, 88, 93) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 24 had diagnoses that included paraplegia and mood disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident was totally dependent on staff for bathing. Review of the resident's bathing record revealed bathing and showers were scheduled for Wednesday and Friday each week. In an interview on November 8, 2022, at 12:05 p.m., Resident 24 stated that she is unsure of the last time she received a shower per her schedule and preference. Review of bathing documentation revealed no evidence that Resident 24 received a shower or was bathed in accordance with the schedule three of seven times on October 2022. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 27 had diagnoses that included muscular dystrophy and quadriplegia. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident was alert and oriented and was dependent on staff for bathing. In an interview on November 8, 2022, at 10:26 a.m., the resident stated, I want a shower and I don't always get one. Review of the bathing schedule revealed that the resident was to have a shower twice a week, on Monday and Thursday mornings. Review of nursing documentation revealed that during the month of October 2022, there was a lack of documentation to support that a shower was offered on seven of nine scheduled days. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 34 had diagnoses that included quadriplegia and fusion of the spine. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident was alert and oriented and was dependent on staff for bathing. In an interview on November 8, 2022, at 9:45 a.m., the resident stated, I don't always get my showers. Review of the bathing schedule revealed that the resident was to have a shower twice a week on Thursday and Sunday evenings. Review of nursing documentation revealed that during the month of October 2022, there was no evidence that a shower was offered to the resident on five of nine scheduled days. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 37 had diagnoses that included hemiplegia of the dominant side. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident required staff assistance for bathing. Review of the bathing schedule revealed that the resident had a physician's order for staff to provide a shower to the resident twice a week. Review of nursing documentation revealed there was a lack of documentation to support that the resident was offered a shower on two of eight days in October and one of three days in November 2022. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 44 had diagnoses that included quadriplegia and complete lesion of cervical spinal cord. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident was alert and oriented and was dependent on staff for bathing. In an interview on November 8, 2022, at 1:45 p.m., the resident stated, I don't always get a shower. Review of the bathing schedule identified that the resident was to have a shower twice a week on Monday and Thursday mornings. Review of nursing documentation revealed that during the month of October 2022, there was a lack of documentation to support that a shower was offered to the resident on four of nine scheduled days. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 51 had diagnoses that included quadriplegia and intracranial injury. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed that Resident 51 was oriented and totally dependent on staff for bathing. Review of the bathing schedule revealed bathing and showers were scheduled for Monday and Friday each week. In an interview on November 10, 2022, at 1:27 p.m., the resident stated staff occasionally did not provide up to two scheduled showers per week. Review of the bathing record revealed no evidence that Resident 51 received a shower or was bathed in accordance with the schedule on October 24, 2022. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 88 had diagnoses that included muscular dystrophy and quadriplegia. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident was alert and oriented and was dependent on staff for bathing. In an interview on November 8, 2022, at 10:45 a.m., the resident stated, I have not been getting showers. Review of the bathing schedule identified that the resident was to have a shower twice a week on Tuesday and Saturday evenings. Review of the clinical record revealed there was a lack of documentation to support that a shower was offered on six of eight scheduled days in October and three of three scheduled days in November 2022. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 93 had diagnoses that included hemiplegia of the dominant side and cerebral palsy. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident was dependent on staff for bathing. Review of the bathing schedule revealed that the resident had a physician's order for staff to provide a shower to the resident twice a week. Review of nursing documentation revealed there was a lack of documentation to support that the resident was offered a shower on two of eight scheduled days in October 2022. 28 Pa. Code 201.29(j) Resident rights.

Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to attempt non-pharmacological interventions to alleviate pain prior to or in conjunction with the administration of pain medication that was ordered on an as needed (PRN) basis for two of 21 sampled residents. (Residents 37, 41) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Assessment and Management of Pain, dated October 20, 2022, revealed that pain management was to include the assessment of pain and, if appropriate, treatment of pain to meet the needs of the residents. Treatment of pain may include the use of medications or application of other modalities and medical devices. A variety of measures (pharmacological, non-pharmacological and interpersonal) were to be selected to facilitate pain management. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 37 had diagnoses that included osteoporosis and chronic pain. There was a physician's order, dated September 29, 2022, that staff provide the resident with narcotic pain medication (Percocet) every eight hours as needed for moderate to severe pain. Review of the October and November 2022, Medication Administration Records (MARs) and nursing notes revealed that there was a lack of documentation to support that the resident was offered non-pharmacological interventions prior to or in conjunction with the administration of the as needed pain medication on 15 of 15 occurrences. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 41 had diagnoses that included osteoarthritis and chronic pain. There was a physician's order, dated August 25, 2022, that staff provide the resident with narcotic pain medication (tramadol) every six hours as needed for moderate to severe pain. Review of the October and November 2022, MARs and nursing notes revealed that there was a lack of documentation to support that the resident was offered non-pharmacological interventions prior to or in conjunction with the administration of the as needed pain medication on 61 of 61 occurrences. During an interview on November 9, 2022, the Director of Nursing stated that the use of non-pharmacological interventions for pain should be documented in the nursing progress notes. On November 10, 2022, at 2:35 p.m., the DON confirmed that there was no evidence that non-pharmacological interventions were attempted when as needed pain medications were administered to Residents 37 and 41. 28 Pa. Code 211.9(a)(1) Pharmacy services. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.

Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide interventions to prevent further decrease in range of motion for one of five sampled residents with limited range of motion. (Resident 74) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 74 had diagnoses that included quadriplegia, and contractures affecting both hands. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicated the resident was unable to communicate, was dependent on staff for activities of daily living, and had limitation in range of motion of both arms and legs. A physician's order dated September 13, 2021, directed staff to apply palm protectors to the resident's hands when in and out of bed as tolerated. An occupational therapy screening dated October 12, 2022, indicated that the the palm protectors were to be worn to protect skin in the palm areas and reduce increased tone in each hand and fingers. Observations on November 8, 2022, at 10:24 a.m., 10:56 a.m., and 1:21 p.m., and on November 9, 2022, at 10:12 a.m. and 12:34 p.m., revealed that Resident 74 was in bed and not wearing the palm protectors. In an interview on November 10, 2022, at 9:25 a.m., the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the resident should have had the palm protectors in place. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.

Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly. Findings include: Observation of the dumpster area on November 8, 2022, at 9:55 a.m., and November 10, 2022, at 10:25 a.m., revealed various particles of debris, including blue disposable gloves and various paper products, on the ground surrounding the trash compactor.

Based on clinical record review, observation, staff interview, and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care and/or transfer out of bed for two of three residents requesting assistance by activating the call bell system. (Resident 2, 3) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 2 had diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident was alert and oriented and was totally dependent on staff for transferring between surfaces and toilet use. Documentation by the physical therapist dated July 27, 2022, noted that the resident was independent with mobility after set up in her motorized wheelchair. The care plan included that the resident would have a positive independent leisure experience utilizing her device to socialize with family and friends and that she would be transferred via mechanical lift or draw sheet and staff assistance to her motorized or manual wheelchair. Observation on August 19, 2022, at 12:17 p.m. revealed that Resident 2 was in bed with her call bell activated. During an interview at 12:24 p.m., Resident 2 stated that she had a bowel movement and needed to be changed. The call bell was deactivated at 12:34 p.m. by the nurse aide (NA 1) and the resident remained in bed and soiled. At 12:36 p.m. the resident stated that she informed staff of the need for incontinence care and was told staff would change her after lunch. At 1:29 p.m., NA 1 had left the unit for the day and Resident 2 remained soiled and in bed. At 1:30 p.m., the call bell was reactivated by Resident 2 and observed to have been turned off by the nurse (LPN 1) at 1:34 p.m. After that, no staff was observed entering the room and at 1:55 p.m., Resident 2 reported that she was still soiled and was concerned that she had a visitor coming at 2:00 p.m. She also stated that she liked to be out of bed daily, especially when she had a visitor and that she would prefer to have been assisted out of bed today. Observation revealed that the resident's visitor arrived to her room at approximately 2:20 p.m. and the resident remained soiled and in bed during her visit when last observed at 2:30 p.m. Over two hours had elapsed since Resident 2 initially rang the call bell for assistance with incontinence care. During an interview on August 19, 2022, at 1:14 p.m., the Unit Manager (RN 1) confirmed that incontinence care was to be provided as needed, did not need to wait until after meal service and that nurse aides were to report the need for assistance to nursing staff. At 2:35 p.m. she reported that she was not aware of Resident 2's need for incontinence care beginning at 12:17 p.m. and that Resident 2 was to have been assisted out of bed after lunch. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 3 had diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident was alert and oriented and was totally dependent on staff for toilet use. The care plan noted that the resident had bowel incontinence, was to be toileted at her request and was to receive peri-care hygiene (cleaning of the private areas) after each episode of incontinence. Observation on August 19, 2022, revealed that Resident 3 was in bed with the call bell activated at 12:45 p.m. During an interview at 12:48 p.m., the resident reported that she was ringing for the bed pan but could not hold it and was now soiled with a bowel movement. At 12:52 p.m., NA 1 was observed to enter the resident's room and deactivate the call bell. The resident was observed and interviewed at 1:52 p.m. and remained soiled in bed. Staff was observed to enter Resident 3's room to provide incontinence care at 2:15 p.m.; one and one-half hours after initially activating the call bell for assistance. 28 Pa. Code 201.29(j) Resident rights. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.