Deficiency Index

Woodbury Wellness Center Inc

Hampstead, North Carolina · CCN 345349

12 surveys since 2012. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2024.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
33
Surveys
12
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2012–2025
’12’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file9/12

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
112
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Pender
Medicare-certified since
1990

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
4
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=16, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Nov 17, 2025

357 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.513.47
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.76—
Annual nurse turnover49.1%49.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$15,646 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ215.4%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD646.2%E—F323.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B215.4%C—
CMS’s current file: 13 of the 33 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6412×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F5611×

    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.

  • F5671×

    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.

  • F5801×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F6231×

    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Woodbury Wellness Center Inc, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF580Jul 24, 2024

    Based on record review, Medical Director interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to notify the on-call provider when Resident #69 had a hypoglycemic episode (blood glucose less than 70 milligrams [mg] per deciliter [dL]). Normal blood glucose ranges from 70 - 100, according to the lab used by the facility. On the morning of 7/6/24, Resident #69's blood glucose (sugar) values were less than 45 mg/dL from 6:03 AM until 7:15 AM. Standing orders were not followed. The on-call provider was not notified of the values or about the resident's refusal of snacks and meal intake, and there was no documentation that Nurse #2 continued to monitor Resident #69's blood glucose (BG) after 7:15 AM. Long-acting insulin was administered by Nurse #2 at 9:00 AM without a documented blood glucose. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Jul 24, 2024

    Based on record review and interviews with the Nurse Practitioner, Medical Director, and staff, the facility failed to manage and assess Resident #69's hypoglycemic episodes (blood glucose less than 70 milligrams [mg] per deciliter [dL]) on the mornings of 7/6/24 and 7/7/24. Normal blood glucose ranges from 70 - 100, according to the lab used by the facility. On the morning of 7/6/24, Resident #69's blood glucose (sugar) values were less than 45 mg/dL from 6:03 AM until 7:15 AM. Standing orders were not followed. The on-call provider was not notified of the values or about the resident's refusal of snacks and meal intake, and there was no documentation that Nurse #2 continued to monitor Resident #69's blood glucose (BG) after 7:15 AM. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF802Mar 2, 2023

    Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to have sufficient staff to ensure timely meals. This had the potential to affect residents receiving food from the kitchen. Findings included: This tag is cross-referenced to F809. Based on observations, record review, and resident, family, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide timely meals for 3 of the 3 meals observed. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving food from the kitchen. During observations in the kitchen on 2/27/23 at 10:15 AM and 3/1/23 at 12:00 PM, the Dietary Manager was observed in the cooking area. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF809Mar 2, 2023

    Based on observations, record review, and resident, family, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide timely meals for 3 of the 3 meals observed. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving food from the kitchen. Findings included: Resident #91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's. His quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated a moderate cognitive impairment. During an interview on 2/27/23 at 11:00 AM, Resident #91 indicated that meals were frequently late and always served at different times. During an interview on 2/27/23 at 1:10 PM, a family member indicated she goes to the facility at lunch time to assist her mother. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 2, 2023

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to date and remove leftover food stored for use in one of one kitchen walk-in refrigerator and failed to discard leftover food in 2 of 3 (100 hall and 200 hall) nourishment room refrigerators. Findings included: 1. A tour was conducted on [DATE] at 10:00 AM with the Dietary Manager of the kitchen walk-in refrigerator. Observations were made of an opened bag of sliced Swiss cheese with no date and an opened bag of shredded cheese with no date. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:05 AM, the Dietary Manager indicated he was told he did not have to label cheese in the walk in. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 33 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Nov 17, 2025Standard1 finding
  • Jul 24, 2024Standard and complaint5 findings · 2 harm
  • Mar 2, 2023Standard7 findings
  • Jul 30, 2021Standard1 finding
  • Jan 21, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 1, 2019Standard and complaint1 finding
  • Jan 17, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 7, 2018Standard and complaint2 findings
Show the 4 earlier surveys
  • Oct 28, 2016Standard2 findings
  • Nov 21, 2013—6 findings
  • Oct 8, 2013—2 findings
  • Sep 13, 2012—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction