Tarboro Health and Rehabilitation LLC
Tarboro, North Carolina · CCN 345510
16 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 62
- Surveys
- 16
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 118
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- SANSTONE HEALTH & REHABILITATION
- County
- Edgecombe
- Medicare-certified since
- 2001
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 125 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in North Carolina.
Last survey on record
Jan 9, 2025
669 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.77 | 3.47 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.46 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 39.2% | 49.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D660.0% | E— | F220.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B110.0% | C110.0% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6952×
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
- F5671×
Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
- F5681×
Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
- F5841×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F6561×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Tarboro Health and Rehabilitation LLC, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Oct 13, 2022
Based on observations, record review and interviews with the resident, facility staff, and physician the facility failed to provide a safe transfer of a resident using a mechanical lift which caused a resident (Resident #72) to fall and fracture her right upper leg. This was for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. The findings included: Resident #72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included diabetes, [CONDITION(S)], bilateral lower extremity amputations and a fracture of the right femur. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #72 was cognitively intact. She required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toilet use ad personal hygiene. She was totally dependent with the assistance of 2 staff for transfers. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF838Nov 16, 2023
Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to review and annually update the Facility Assessment and to ensure the Facility Assessment identified and addressed the care required for the population of residents with a tracheostomy and to address the staff training necessary to competently provide tracheostomy care. Findings included: Review of the Facility Assessment revealed the assessment was last updated in November 2022. The document indicated the facility had completed education/training/competencies with staff specific to resident care needs, however, the facility lacked training/competencies to care for residents who required a trach. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF867Nov 16, 2023
Based on record review, observations, staff, and resident interviews, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor interventions that the committee had previously put in place following the recertification and complaint investigation surveys of 10-13-22. This was for 4 recited deficiencies in the areas of Emergency Preparedness (E001), Safe/Clean/Comfortable/Homelike Environment (F584), Respiratory/Tracheostomy care and Suctioning (F695), and Facility Assessment (F838). The continued failure during 2 federal surveys of record showed a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective Quality Assurance Program. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF838Oct 13, 2022
Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to review and annually update the Facility Assessment. Findings included: Review of the Facility Assessment revealed the assessment was last updated in September 2022. The document indicated the facility had a facility based and community-based risk assessment utilizing an all-hazards approach however there was not a risk assessment completed in the document. The Facility Assessment also indicated the facility had an Emergency Preparedness Plan that was up to date however the Emergency Preparedness Plan that was present was not complete. The Administrator was interviewed on 10-13-22 at 5:07pm. The Administrator stated he was not able to produce a facility based and community-based risk assessment. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF561Oct 13, 2022
Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to (1) honor resident choice to receive a shower for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #82 and Resident #77), (2) honor resident choice when to receive [CONDITION(S)] care and enteral feedings for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #16) and the facility failed to (3) honor resident choice to receive double portions as ordered by the Physician for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #25) reviewed for choices. Findings included: 1 Resident #82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #82 was mildly cognitively impaired with no documentation of refusal of care. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 62 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 9, 2025Standard2 findings
- Nov 16, 2023Standard and complaint8 findings
- Oct 13, 2022Standard and complaint15 findings · 1 harm
- May 27, 2021Standard and complaint5 findings
- Jun 11, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Aug 23, 2019Standard3 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 16, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Aug 10, 2018Standard and complaint5 findings · 1 harm
Show the 8 earlier surveys
- Jul 20, 2017Standard2 findings
- Aug 11, 2016Standard2 findings
- Dec 5, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Sep 11, 2015Standard4 findings
- Oct 23, 2014Standard4 findings
- Nov 1, 2012—3 findings
- Dec 1, 2011—5 findings
- Jan 27, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Autumn Care of StatesvilleStatesville2 harm findings
- Magnolia Lane Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterMorganton1 harm finding
- Lake Park Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterIndian Trail4 harm findings
- Woodbury Wellness Center IncHampstead2 harm findings
- Mecklenburg Heath and RehabilitationCharlotte2 harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction