The Springs of Greers Ferry
Heber Springs, Arkansas · CCN 045158
34 surveys since 2011, 10 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 150
- Surveys
- 34
- Harm or worse
- 10
- Immediate jeopardy
- 6
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 140
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- THE SPRINGS ARKANSAS
- County
- Cleburne · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1990
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 46 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Arkansas.
Last survey on record
Aug 15, 2024
816 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.01 | 3.82 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.33 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 44.3% | 49.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D321.4% | E964.3% | F214.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F8032×
Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F5581×
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
- F6571×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at The Springs of Greers Ferry, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 15, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen ceiling tiles were cleaned to provide a sanitary environment for food preparation; and the ice machine on the 400 Hall was maintained in a clean and sanitary condition to prevent food and beverage contamination in 1 of 1 kitchen; expired food items were promptly removed/discarded on or before the expiration or use by date to prevent the growth of bacteria; leftover food items were used in a manner to maintain food quality; and dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 6, 2023
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in the freezer and refrigerator were covered, sealed and dated to minimize the potential for food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen; and expired food items were promptly removed from stock to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen; dietary staff washed their hands and changed gloves before handling food items to prevent the potential for cross contamination for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. These failed practices had the potential to affect 67 residents who received meals from the Kitchen (Total Census: 67), according to the list provided by the Dietary Supervisor on [DATE] a PM. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 1, 2022
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items were removed from stock by their expiration date, food items which were opened were secured in a container that was sealed, equipment was clean, staff checked the temperature of food on the steamtable prior to it being served, and staff washed their hands between clean and dirty tasks to prevent potential food borne illnesses in 1 of 1 facility. The findings are: 1. On 3/28/22 at 10:30 AM, a gallon container of ranch dressing was located on the top shelf of the refrigerator. The container was approximately ½ full. The container had a use by date of 11/13/21. a. On 3/28/22 10:35 AM, a box of sliced, smoked ham was located on the top shelf of the middle refrigerator. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF885Apr 1, 2022
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to inform the residents and/or representatives of a change in the COVID status of the facility by 5:00 PM on the next calendar day after a positive test result was identified to prevent further transmission of COVID-19 in 1 of 1 facility. The failed practice had the potential to affect all 56 residents according to the Resident Census and Condition of Resident form dated 3/29/22. The findings are: Resident (R) #201 had diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . On the Minimum Data Set, dated dated [DATE] the resident received a score of 10 (8 - 12 moderate impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status. (BIMS). The resident requires extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, toileting, and meals. a. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF886Apr 1, 2022
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff were tested for COVID 19 according to their Level of Community Transmission and Outbreak testing to prevent transmission of COVID 19. The findings are: 1. On 03/31/2022 at 01:55 PM, the Infection Preventionist (IP) was asked, Are you in Outbreak? She stated, Yes, there was a positive that was in the building. We are in outbreak now. Tuesday and Fridays [testing is done] for 14 days. If no positives, then we go back to county rate. 2. On 03/31/22 at 03:31 PM the County Level Latest Data for Arkansas, Date generated for Monday March 28, 2022, documented, .Cleburne County . Level of Community Transmission . moderate . KEY: Level of Community Transmission . […]
Read 30 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 30 of 150 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 15, 2024Standard6 findings
- Jul 6, 2023Standard8 findings
- May 30, 2023Complaint1 finding
- May 23, 2023Complaint3 findings
- Dec 20, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Jul 28, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Apr 1, 2022Standard10 findings
- Aug 17, 2021Complaint4 findings
Show the 26 earlier surveys
- May 14, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Jan 14, 2021Standard3 findings
- Dec 31, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Aug 12, 2020Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 17, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Mar 6, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Feb 26, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jul 31, 2019Standard and complaint8 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 1, 2018Standard9 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 7, 2018Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
- Jun 15, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Feb 14, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Aug 24, 2017Standard4 findings
- Jun 2, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Jul 21, 2016Standard11 findings
- Jan 6, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Jun 19, 2015Standard6 findings
- Jul 11, 2014Standard3 findings
- Jan 29, 2014—1 finding
- Jul 3, 2013Complaint2 findings
- Jun 7, 2013Standard15 findings · 2 harm
- Oct 5, 2012—6 findings
- Sep 6, 2012—3 findings
- Apr 13, 2012—3 findings
- May 21, 2011—4 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 31, 2011Standard21 findings · 2 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction