Heritage Living Center
Conway, Arkansas · CCN 045308
33 surveys since 2010, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 136
- Surveys
- 33
- Harm or worse
- 6
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 140
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- ANTHONY & BRYAN ADAMS
- County
- Faulkner
- Medicare-certified since
- 1996
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 46 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Arkansas.
Last survey on record
Jul 24, 2026
108 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.60 | 3.82 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.43 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 38.3% | 49.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $13,065 across 1 penalty
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G211.8% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D847.1% | E423.5% | F317.6% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F5801×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F5831×
Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
- F6001×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Heritage Living Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Jul 24, 2026
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's(s') right to be free from neglect for one (Resident #1) of six residents reviewed for neglect. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a cumulative effect of individual staff failures in the provision of care and services did not lead to an environment promoting neglect, when on 07/09/2026: - At or about 8:55 AM, CNA #1 performed a one-person pivot transfer of Resident #1 to the shower chair, in direct deviation from the resident's established care plan, which required two staff members and a mechanical lift for all transfers. Resident #1 reported to staff she heard a cracking sound and experienced pain in her leg. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jul 24, 2026
Based on interviews, record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed the Care Plan for one (Resident #1) of six residents reviewed. This failed practice led to an avoidable accident in which the resident obtained a fracture of the right distal femur. The findings include: Review of the Medical Diagnosis portion of the electronic health record revealed Resident #1 had diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, kidney failure, type 2 diabetes, muscle wasting, and atrophy. Review of Resident #1s quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/16/26, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF838Nov 26, 2025
Based on interviews and facility document review, the facility failed to utilize the Facility Assessment to ensure the minimum weekend staffing needs were met a total of 8 out of 26 weekend days, for the residents during April, May, and June of 2025, based on the Facility Assessment staffing requirements. The findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, last updated 10/31/2024, revealed an average daily census of 125-130 residents. The Facility Assessment, last updated 10/31/2024, revealed direct-care staffing needed to ensure residents' needs were met daily, were as follows: Total Number Needed Average or Range Licensed nurses providing direct care 8-11 Nurse aides 35-50 The Facility Assessment also revealed an Individual staff assignment for nurse staffing needs by shift, for… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jun 5, 2024
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure dietary staff washed their hands and changed their gloves before handling food items to prevent the potential for cross contamination for the residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen; Hot food items were not maintained at or above 135 degrees Fahrenheit on the steam table while awaiting service to prevent potential food borne illness for the residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. These failed practices had the potential to affect 127 residents who received meals from the Kitchen. The findings are: 1. On 06/02/24 at 10:30 AM, Dietary Aide (DA) #1 turned the sink on and washed her hands. She used her bare hands to turn off the faucet, contaminating her hands. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 11, 2023
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the foods stored in the freezer were covered and sealed to minimize the potential for food-borne illness for the residents who their received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen, dietary staff washed their hands between dirty and clean tasks, and before they handled clean equipment or food items to prevent potential for cross contamination. These failed practices had the potential to affect 127 residents who received meals from the kitchen (total census: 127), as documented on a list provided by Dietary Supervisor on 05/10/23 at 10:55 AM. The findings are: 1. On 05/08/23 between 11:30 AM and 12:54 PM, the following were observed in the kitchen: a. […]
Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 136 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 24, 2026Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Nov 26, 2025Standard4 findings
- Aug 14, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jun 5, 2024Standard5 findings
- Sep 20, 2023Complaint2 findings
- May 11, 2023Standard3 findings
- Dec 30, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jan 13, 2022Standard11 findings
Show the 25 earlier surveys
- Aug 26, 2021Complaint3 findings
- Jul 15, 2021Complaint7 findings
- Apr 29, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Feb 24, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Nov 13, 2020Standard and complaint22 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 21, 2020Complaint4 findings
- Jul 8, 2020Complaint1 finding
- May 17, 2019Standard7 findings
- Aug 3, 2018Standard10 findings
- Mar 20, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Sep 28, 2017Complaint3 findings
- Feb 15, 2017Complaint1 finding
- May 27, 2016Standard5 findings
- Apr 24, 2015Standard3 findings
- May 22, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Mar 14, 2014Standard3 findings
- Apr 5, 2013—5 findings
- Feb 15, 2013—2 findings
- Oct 4, 2012—1 finding
- Jul 19, 2012Complaint6 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 23, 2012—6 findings
- Dec 8, 2011—1 finding
- Oct 18, 2011—1 finding
- Mar 24, 2011—8 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 16, 2010—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction