Deficiency Index

The Maples at Har-Ber Meadows

Springdale, Arkansas · CCN 045407

17 surveys since 2011, 8 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
99
Surveys
17
Harm or worse
8
Immediate jeopardy
5
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy5

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file14/17

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
140
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
ANTHONY & BRYAN ADAMS
County
Washington
Medicare-certified since
2005

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 46 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Arkansas.

Last survey on record

Dec 4, 2025

340 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.983.82
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.15—
Annual nurse turnover49.2%49.1%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD436.4%E763.6%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 11 of the 99 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5611×

    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.

  • F5801×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F6771×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F6951×

    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at The Maples at Har-Ber Meadows, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF880Jun 10, 2021

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a non-vaccinated Covid-19 negative resident (Resident #4) did not remain in the room with a non-vaccinated Covid-19 positive resident (Resident #5). This failed practice resulted in Immediate Jeopardy, which could have caused serious harm or death to Resident #4, who had tested negative for COVID-19. The failed practice had the potential to cause more than minimal harm to 10 residents who had tested negative for COVID-19 and resided on the Dementia Care Unit (Makeshift COVID-19 unit), according to the Daily Census provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 06/02/2021 at 1:30 p.m. The Administrator and DON were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 06/02/2021 at 5:20 p.m. The findings are: 1. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Apr 1, 2022

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of breathing difficulties and low pulse oxygenation so other treatment options could be developed and implemented for 1 (Resident #348) of 1 sampled resident who had a significant change in condition. This failed practice resulted in actual harm for Resident #348, who exhibited respiratory distress and received no additional treatment. The findings are: Resident #348 had diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and no Minimum Data Set (MDS) was complete. There was no Baseline care plan completed to understand the resident's needs. a. The Physician order [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . b. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Apr 1, 2022

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure all staff and visitors were fully screened, upon entrance, and contact and droplet precautions were followed by staff entering isolation resident room, to prevent the spread of COVID-19 and other communicable diseases in 1 of 1 facility. These failed practices had the potential to affect all 101 residents who resided in the facility per the Resident Census and Condition of Resident form dated, 3/27/22. The findings are: 1. On 03/27/22 at 10:55 AM, (Sunday) the surveyors entered the facility, and the weekend Registered Nurse (RN) Supervisor informed the surveyors the temperature machine for screening was not working and she could not find covers for the thermometer. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF580Jul 18, 2024

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's responsible part/legal representative was notified when a resident refused treatment to provide the necessary information to guide treatment and decrease the potential for related complications for 1 (Resident #110) of 1 sample mix residents. The findings are: Review of a facility policy titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, dated February 2021, indicated our facility promptly notifies the resident, his or her primary care provider, and the resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status (e.g., changes in level of care, billing/payments, resident rights, etc.). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF677Jul 18, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper nail care was provided to a resident who was dependent on nail care for one (Resident #27) resident and the facility failed to ensure a resident who required assistance with personal hygiene was regularly offered hair care to maintain good grooming and hygiene for one (Resident #96) of two sampled (Resident #27 and #96) residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Findings include: A review of a facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting, revised March 2018, indicated, Policy Statement . […]

Read 27 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 27 of 99 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Dec 4, 2025Standard and complaint2 findings
  • Jul 18, 2024Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Jul 21, 2023Standard2 findings
  • Apr 5, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 1, 2022Standard12 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 10, 2021Infection control1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 9, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 8, 2021Standard10 findings
Show the 9 earlier surveys
  • Aug 12, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 12, 2019Standard8 findings
  • Aug 23, 2018Standard5 findings
  • Apr 27, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Mar 25, 2016Standard2 findings
  • Mar 13, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Feb 1, 2013—2 findings
  • Dec 7, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Nov 18, 2011—38 findings · 5 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction