Shepherd of the Valley Poland
Poland, Ohio · CCN 366453
7 surveys since 2018. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2024.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 12
- Surveys
- 7
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 32
- Ownership
- Non profit - Church related
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Mahoning
- Medicare-certified since
- 2017
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=7, floor 20).
Last survey on record
May 8, 2026
185 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.53 | 4.41 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.05 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 25.8% | 50.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G114.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D685.7% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Shepherd of the Valley Poland, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Dec 27, 2024
Based on closed record review, review of emergency room /hospital records, policy review, and interview the facility failed to adequately monitor and provide timely and necessary care and services for an acute change in condition for Resident #27. Actual harm occurred beginning on [DATE] when Resident #27, who had chronic Stage 3 kidney disease, was noted to have an acute change in condition (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, fatigue and decreased appetite) that was not adequately treated. Between [DATE] and [DATE], the resident continued to exhibit a deterioration in condition including hypotension, poor oral intake and nausea/vomiting and diarrhea. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF628May 8, 2026
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #32 had appropriate supports in place for discharge to include discharge medications. This affected one (Resident #32) of three residents reviewed for discharge planning. The facility census was 31. Findings include:Review of Resident #32's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 01/10/26 with diagnoses including chronic systolic congestive heart failure, bipolar disorder and pain in the right knee.Review of Resident #32's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition.Review of Resident #32's progress note dated 01/09/26 at 7:53 P.M. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF676Sep 18, 2025
Based on observation, review of the medical record, interview with staff, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was shaved per his preferences. This affected one resident (Resident #1) of two reviewed for activities of daily living.Findings Include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure, pneumonia, retention of urine, acute cough, radiculopathy, hypertension, glaucoma, heart failure, atherosclerotic heart disease, hyperlipidemia, and chronic kidney disease.Review of the physician's orders revealed Resident #1 had an order for Plavix (blood thinner) 10 milligrams once daily dated 09/04/25.Review of the plan of care dated 09/04/25 revealed Resident #1 was on… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF695Sep 18, 2025
Based on observation, review of the medical record, and interview with staff, the facility failed to ensure the portable oxygen tank for Resident #1 was working properly. This affected one resident (Resident #1) of two residents (Resident #1 and #31) who received oxygen therapy.Findings Include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure, pneumonia, retention of urine, acute cough, radiculopathy, hypertension, glaucoma, heart failure, atherosclerotic heart disease, hyperlipidemia, and chronic kidney disease.Review of the physician's orders revealed Resident #1 had an order dated 09/10/25 to wean off oxygen but keep oxygen saturation at 92 precent (normal ranges from 95% to 100%). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF580Dec 27, 2024
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of weight gain, low blood pressure and a change in appetite. This affected two (Resident's #5 and #27) of six residents reviewed for notification of changes. The census was 26. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed an 11/20/24 admission with diagnoses including fractured right femur, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, heart failure, asthma, acute cholecystitis, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, atherosclerotic heart disease, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, anemia, and gastroesophageal heart disease. […]
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 8, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Sep 18, 2025Standard2 findings
- Dec 27, 2024Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 1, 2023Standard1 finding
- Jul 8, 2021Standard1 finding
- Apr 11, 2019Standard2 findings
- Feb 22, 2018Standard3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction