Deficiency Index

Shepherd of the Valley Howland

Howland, Ohio · CCN 366258

13 surveys since 2011, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
39
Surveys
13
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse3

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file10/13

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
65
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Trumbull
Medicare-certified since
2003

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=6, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jun 5, 2025

522 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.294.41
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.91—
Annual nurse turnover32.1%50.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1090.9%E—F19.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 11 of the 39 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Shepherd of the Valley Howland, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jan 19, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items were dated when opened. This had the potential to affect the 52 residents who ate food from the kitchen. Resident #37 was identified by the facility as receiving nothing by mouth. The facility census was 53. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen on 01/17/23 from 8:10 A.M. to 8:30 A.M. with Dietary Cook #35 revealed the walk-in cook's freezer had one undated, half-full resealed bag of pork sausage links, one undated resealed bag of three breaded fish fillets, one undated half-full resealed bag of green peppers, and one undated half-full resealed bag of tator tots. The reach-in cooler by the toaster had one undated storage bag with sliced pastrami. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF578Jun 5, 2025

    Based on record review, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #36's advance directives were accurate. This affected one (Resident #36) out of two residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility census was 44. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, spinal stenosis, and history of myocardial infarction. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #36 had impaired cognition. Review of the care plan dated [DATE] revealed Resident #36's was a full code. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Jun 5, 2025

    Based on record review, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #27's bowel elimination was monitored effectively. This affected one (Resident #27) out of one resident reviewed for constipation. The facility census was 44. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 10/28/22 with diagnoses including fractured right femur, gastroenteritis, colitis (inflammation of the colon), Alzheimer's disease, melena (black tarry stool), and diverticulosis (small, bulging pouches in the lining of the large intestine). Review of the care plan dated 11/04/22 revealed Resident #27 was at risk for constipation due to medication side effects, reduced mobility, weakness, colitis, and diverticulosis. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF695Jun 5, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to post oxygen safety signs per acceptable standards of nursing practice. This affected three (Residents #101, #103 and #105) out of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. There were eight (Residents #4, #5, #10, #13, #33, #101, #103 and #105) who received oxygen therapy. The facility census was 44. Findings include: Observation on 06/02/25 at 10:33 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #567 revealed Residents #101 and #103 were in bed with oxygen being administered, and there were no oxygen safety signs posted within the room or at the entrances. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880Jun 5, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to perform adequate infection control practices during urinary catheter care for Resident #3. This affected one (Resident #3) out of two residents reviewed for urinary catheter care. There were two (Residents #3 and #36) who had urinary catheters. The census was 44. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 04/30/25. Diagnoses included neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, benign prostatic hyperplasia and end stage renal disease. The plan of care dated 04/30/25 indicated Resident #3 had a chronic urinary catheter which required catheter care and management. Observation on 06/03/25 at 10:03 A.M. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 39 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 5, 2025Standard4 findings
  • Feb 10, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 19, 2023Standard1 finding
  • Jan 2, 2020Standard6 findings
  • Nov 8, 2018Standard8 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 28, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Apr 14, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 20, 2014Standard3 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
  • Feb 18, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 10, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jan 17, 2013—1 finding
  • Sep 22, 2011—7 findings
  • Jun 20, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction