Deficiency Index

Otterbein at Granville

Granville, Ohio · CCN 366314

9 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
31
Surveys
9
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file7/9

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
22
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
OTTERBEIN SENIORLIFE
County
Licking
Medicare-certified since
2005

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=10, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Apr 28, 2026

195 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.464.41
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.57—
Annual nurse turnover55.6%50.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD6100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 6 of the 31 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Otterbein at Granville, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF605Apr 28, 2026

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide proper justification for the use of anti-psychotic medications. This affected one (Resident #7) of two residents reviewed for medication use. The census was 18.Findings Include:Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were Parkinson's disease, morbid obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, major depressive disorder, insomnia, sleep apnea, anxiety disorder, delusional disorder, dementia, dysphagia, psychotic disorder, vitamin D deficiency, anemia, and Type II Diabetes. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Apr 28, 2026

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure neurological assessments were completed after an unwitnessed fall. This affected one (Resident #6) out of one residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 18.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 10/16/23 with diagnoses including history of transient ischemic attack, syncope and collapse, hypertension, dementia and atrial fibrillation.Review of the care plan dated 04/15/25 revealed the resident had a history of an actual fall with minor injury. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF770Apr 28, 2026

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered laboratory specimens were collected. This affected one resident (Resident #5) out of one resident reviewed for laboratory services. The facility census was 18.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 04/19/24 with diagnoses of major depressive disorder, Type II Diabetes Mellitus, chronic kidney disease, calculus of kidney and morbid obesity due to excess calories.Review of the care plan dated 05/23/25 revealed the resident had renal insufficiency with interventions to monitor laboratory reports as ordered and report results to the physician. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF881Apr 28, 2026

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate monitoring for the long term use of antibiotics. This affected one (Resident #21) of one resident reviewed for antibiotic use. The census was 18.Findings Include: Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were senile degeneration of brain, adult failure to thrive, hypothyroidism, dysphagia, feeding difficulties, anemia, cognitive communication deficit, anxiety disorder, hypertension, major depressive disorder, cerebral atherosclerosis, abnormal weight loss, apraxia, polyosteoarthritis, vascular dementia, restlessness and agitation, vitamin D deficiency, Type II Diabetes, and somnolence. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684May 29, 2025

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a treatment was implemented when Resident #8 obtained a skin tear and the treatment was discontinued when the skin tear was resolved. This affected one resident (#8) of two residents reviewed for skin conditions. The facility census was 19. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 10/16/23. Diagnoses included but were not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting right dominant side, personal history of transient ischemic attack, anxiety disorder, muscle weakness and depression. Review of the progress notes dated 04/26/25 at 1:06 P.M. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 31 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 28, 2026Standard4 findings
  • May 29, 2025Standard2 findings
  • Oct 14, 2021Standard4 findings
  • Mar 28, 2019Standard4 findings
  • Feb 1, 2018Standard1 finding
  • Oct 13, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Aug 6, 2015Standard7 findings · 1 harm
  • May 9, 2014Standard4 findings
Show the 1 earlier survey
  • Nov 18, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction