Oak Forest Health and Rehabilitation
Winston Salem, North Carolina · CCN 345443
24 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 99
- Surveys
- 24
- Harm or worse
- 8
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 5
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 170
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- LIBERTY SENIOR LIVING
- County
- Forsyth
- Medicare-certified since
- 1993
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 1
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 92 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in North Carolina.
Last survey on record
Jul 23, 2026
109 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.83 | 3.49 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.29 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 61.3% | 52.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $38,527 across 3 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J12.7% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G25.4% | H12.7% | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2464.9% | E410.8% | F38.1% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B12.7% | C12.7% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6894×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F5613×
Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
- F5843×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F7613×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F8673×
Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Oak Forest Health and Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF760Nov 8, 2024
Based on record reviews, interviews with resident, staff, Nurse Practitioner (NP), and Medical Director, the facility failed to protect a resident from a significant medication error when on 10/18/24, Nurse #1, an agency nurse, administered the wrong medications to Resident #1. On 10/18/24, Nurse #1 administered Resident #1's prescribed medications during the morning medication pass and then later in the morning administered medications prescribed for Resident #2 to Resident #1. The wrongly administered medications included olanzapine (antipsychotic medication), lamotrigine (anticonvulsant medication), gabapentin (anticonvulsant medication), paroxetine (antidepressant medication), haloperidol (antipsychotic medication), and clonazepam (antianxiety medication). […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF760Jun 14, 2021
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error when a medication aide failed to identify residents which resulted in 2 residents receiving the other one's medications (Residents #97 and #64) resulting in medication induced shock for Resident #97 requiring hospitalization and intravenous medications and fluids for 2 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for medication administration (Residents #97 and #64). Immediate jeopardy began on 5/22/21 when, during medication administration on the 400 hall, Medication Aide #1 administered Resident #97's medications to Resident #64 and Resident #64's medications to Resident #97 and was removed on 6/10/21 when the facility implemented a credible allegation of immediate jeopardy removal. […]
- Actual harm, patternF689Nov 15, 2022
Based on record review, staff interviews, and nurse practitioner interviews, the facility failed to provide care in a safe manner and/or implement fall safety interventions developed and care planned by its interdisciplinary team (IDT) for 4 of 5 residents (Residents #2, #335, #7 and #132) reviewed for falls. Resident #2 sustained a fall from his bed that resulted in a fracture of the left femur neck requiring open reduction and internal fixation (surgical intervention). Resident #335 sustained a fall from his bed that resulted in a non-displaced fracture to his right femur that was conservatively managed (no surgical intervention). […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jun 12, 2025
Based on observation, record review, and staff and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interviews, the facility failed to provide care in a safe manner when Resident #71 was rolled out of her bed during incontinent care hitting the floor. Resident #71 was sent to the Emergency Department (ED) and diagnosed with a fracture of her left distal (away from the center) clavicle, a closed fracture of the second rib on the left side, and a large left-sided scalp hematoma. The facility also failed to conduct smoking assessments when Resident #117 was not assessed for smoking. The deficient practice occurred for 2 of 4 sampled residents reviewed for supervision to prevent accidents (Resident #71 and Resident #117). Findings included: 1. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Dec 18, 2023
Based on record review, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide care in a safe manner and failed to ensure fall mat was in place for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #1). Resident #1 sustained a fall from his bed after the Nurse Aide walked away after raising the height of the bed and failed to ensure the fall mat was placed next to his bed when she left to retrieve items from his closet. The fall resulted in a 6.5 centimeter laceration to the forehead, 2 centimeter laceration to the nose, 1.5 centimeter laceration to the upper lip, 1 centimeter laceration inside of the mouth, and an 8 millimeter parenchymal hematoma corresponding in location to a previous hematoma (Resident #1). […]
Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 99 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 23, 2026Standard and complaint5 findings
- Jun 12, 2025Standard and complaint9 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 12, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Nov 8, 2024Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 15, 2024Standard and complaint7 findings
- Dec 18, 2023Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 26, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jul 7, 2023Complaint2 findings
Show the 16 earlier surveys
- Feb 2, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Nov 15, 2022Standard and complaint8 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 20, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jun 14, 2021Standard and complaint8 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 5, 2020Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 19, 2019Complaint3 findings
- May 10, 2019Standard4 findings
- Feb 8, 2019Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
- Dec 6, 2018Complaint3 findings
- Apr 27, 2018Standard and complaint15 findings
- Mar 30, 2017Standard4 findings
- Aug 21, 2014Standard and complaint4 findings
- May 9, 2013—2 findings
- May 31, 2012—1 finding
- Mar 1, 2012—3 findings
- Apr 14, 2011—4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction