Moravian Village of Bethlehem
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania · CCN 396096
25 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 73
- Surveys
- 25
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 93
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Northampton
- Medicare-certified since
- 2005
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 47 not-for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Pennsylvania.
Last survey on record
Jul 1, 2026
131 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.33 | 4.44 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.22 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 46.8% | 37.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D975.0% | E18.3% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B216.7% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6842×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F5541×
Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
- F5801×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F6281×
Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
- F6561×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Moravian Village of Bethlehem, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 5, 2021
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food under sanitary conditions in the kitchen. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen on August 3, 2021, at 9:29 a.m. revealed the following items in the walk in refrigerator: A container of prepared marinara sauce with a use by date of July 28 A container of prepared chicken and vegetable soup with a use by date of August 2 A container of prepared mashed potatoes with a use by date of July 31 A container of blueberry yogurt with a use by date of August 1 Strawberries noted in three different containers with white mold on the surface of the fruit A pan of cooked ground chicken with a production date of July 23 During the observation period, the production manager stated that prepared food… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF628Jul 1, 2026
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide the resident and the resident's representative(s) with a written notice of transfer(s), which included the reasons for the moves, the effective date of the transfer, a statement of the residents' appeal rights, and the Ombudsman information. Additionally, the facility failed to provide written notice of duration of the bed-hold policy, and copies of the written transfer notices to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for three out of three residents who were transferred out of the facility. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF760Aug 21, 2026
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that one of four sampled residents was free of a significant medication error (Resident 1).Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration, last reviewed January 27, 2026, revealed that prior to administration of medication, facility staff should take all measures required by facility policy and applicable law, including confirming that the Medication Administration Record (MAR) reflected the most recent medication order. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia, heart failure, and diabetes. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF554Jul 1, 2026
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess a resident's capability to self-administer medications for two of 10 sampled residents. (Residents 4 and 5) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Self-Administration of Medications, last reviewed January 27, 2026, revealed that a resident may exercise the right to self-administer medications when determined that the practice was safe. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Jul 1, 2026
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that addressed each resident's needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment for one of 10 sampled residents. (Resident 8)Findings include:Clinical record review revealed that Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included depression and anxiety. The Minimum Data Set Care Area Assessment summary dated June 11, 2026, noted that the resident's psychotropic drug use was to be addressed in the care plan. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 73 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 21, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jul 1, 2026Standard6 findings
- Apr 9, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Mar 12, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Jun 18, 2025Standard1 finding
- Jun 14, 2023Standard2 findings
- May 1, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jun 30, 2022Standard3 findings
Show the 17 earlier surveys
- Aug 5, 2021Standard3 findings
- Feb 28, 2020Standard1 finding
- Jan 25, 2019Standard6 findings
- Feb 2, 2018Standard1 finding
- Nov 8, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Mar 22, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Mar 17, 2017Standard1 finding
- Aug 24, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Feb 19, 2016Standard2 findings
- Jul 30, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Mar 20, 2015Standard12 findings
- Apr 11, 2014Standard2 findings
- Mar 29, 2013—4 findings
- Feb 19, 2013—3 findings
- Apr 20, 2012—8 findings
- Mar 1, 2012—1 finding
- May 5, 2011—7 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction