F684 in Pennsylvania. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Pennsylvania cites F684 more often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share1.42×
1.42 times the share F684 takes of citations nationally.
Share of Pennsylvania citations6.09%
Of every deficiency written in Pennsylvania in 2025, this is the portion that was F684.
Pennsylvania6.09%
National4.29%
Share of all citations that were F684.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Pennsylvania surveyors wrote
F684 findings written in Pennsylvania, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
J · Immediate jeopardy, isolatedJuly 15, 2026
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide prescribed treatment for one of five sampled residents with wounds. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation. (Resident 1) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled Wound Treatment Management, last reviewed on September 4, 2025, revealed that staff were to provide wound care treatments in accordance with physicians' orders. …
Based on review of facility policy, facility documents, clinical record review, and a staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that residents were provided appropriate treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for two of ten residents (Resident R18 and R98). Resulting in harm of change in condition without timely intervention (Resident R18) and harm of hospitalization (Resident R98) requiring a blood transfusion. Findings include:Review of facility policy Assisting the Nurse in Examining and Assessing the Resident reviewed 1/20/26, revealed the primary purpose of assessing the resident is to gather detailed information that will help to develop a plan of care that is appropriate for the resident. …
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedSeptember 3, 2026
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice for a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter one of two residents reviewed (Resident 8).Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 8 revealed the resident returned from the hospital on July 1, 2026, with an order for a foley catheter (a flexible tube placed through the urethra into the bladder to drain urine continuously). The diagnosis provided by the physician for his foley catheter was urinary retention (inability to completely empty the bladder) due to obstructive uropathy (blockage in the urinary tract). There was no evidence of any orders related the care of Resident 8's catheter. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction