Deficiency Index

Manchester Commons of Presbyterian Seniorcare

Erie, Pennsylvania · CCN 395996

17 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
50
Surveys
17
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file13/17

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
78
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
PRESBYTERIAN SENIORCARE NETWORK
County
Erie
Medicare-certified since
1996

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
5
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 47 not-for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Pennsylvania.

Last survey on record

Jul 31, 2026

101 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.934.44
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.27—
Annual nurse turnover42.6%37.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1487.5%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B16.3%C16.3%
CMS’s current file: 16 of the 50 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6552×

    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6842×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F7612×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F5531×

    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Manchester Commons of Presbyterian Seniorcare, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761Oct 20, 2022

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to discard an expired [MEDICATION(S)] (TB) solution for two of two medications rooms observed ([NAME] and Eagle Pass). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled, Medication Storage In The Facility, dated [DATE], with a policy review date of [DATE], indicated that Certain medications or package types, such as multiple dose injectable vials once opened, require an expiration date shorter than the manufacturer's expiration date to insure medication purity and potency. Review of manufacturer's instructions on the box of TB solution indicated to Discard 30 days after opening. Observation of Eagle Pass Medication Room on [DATE], at 11:30 a.m. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF802Dec 9, 2021

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient staff with appropriate competencies to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services on two of five units (Avonia and Blue [NAME]). Findings include: During an interview with the Director of Nutritional Services on 12/6/21, at 2:40 p.m. revealed that dietary staff were transporting meals from the main kitchen to the units to be served from the dining areas on each unit. As there were only three dietary aides that were available to serve the meals, two of the five units utilized nursing staff to plate the foods and distribute the meals to the residents on their unit. Observations on Avonia on 12/06/21, at 5:00 p.m. revealed nursing staff plating food without hairnets. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF641Jul 31, 2026

    Based on review of clinical records and Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care), and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the MDS assessments accurately reflected the status for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident R67).Findings include:Resident R67's clinical record revealed an admission date of 4/24/26, with diagnoses including protein calorie malnutrition, pressure ulcer right buttock stage three (wound with full thickness tissue loss), diabetes mellitus and high blood pressure.Resident R67's clinical record revealed assessment documentation provided by the contracted wound care specialist as follows:-6/02/26, Right Buttock is a Deep Tissue Pressure Injury (DTI)… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF553Jul 2, 2025

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident was offered the opportunity to participate in the development, review, and/or revision of their person-centered care plan for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident R6). Findings include: Review of facility policy dated 2/2025, entitled Skilled Nursing - Comprehensive Care Plans indicated the resident will be notified of his/her right to request meetings, revisions to care plan, and to be informed in advance of changes to care plan. The policy further stated that the resident has the right to refuse to participate in the development of his/her care plan and medical and nursing treatments. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF578Jul 2, 2025

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician's orders and resident Resuscitation Authorization (a legal document specifying the resident/responsible party choices regarding life-sustaining treatments) were consistent for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident R18). Findings include: A facility policy entitled Resident Rights Advance Directives POLST Resuscitation Code Status dated 2/2025, revealed Resuscitation Code Status is the individual's preference regarding CPR [Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation-CPR-emergency life-saving procedure that is done when breathing or a heartbeat has stopped and when performed immediately can double or triple chances of survival after cardiac arrest] and other… […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 50 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 31, 2026Standard1 finding
  • Jul 2, 2025Standard8 findings
  • Aug 8, 2024Standard5 findings
  • Sep 29, 2023Standard2 findings
  • Oct 20, 2022Standard2 findings
  • Dec 9, 2021Standard3 findings
  • May 27, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 20, 2018Standard1 finding
Show the 9 earlier surveys
  • Jul 24, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 23, 2017Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Oct 14, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 22, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Mar 6, 2015Standard4 findings
  • Apr 25, 2014Standard3 findings
  • Mar 28, 2013—4 findings
  • Apr 6, 2012—2 findings
  • May 5, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction