Every finding on record at Manchester Commons of Presbyterian Seniorcare

Based on review of clinical records and Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care), and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the MDS assessments accurately reflected the status for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident R67).Findings include:Resident R67's clinical record revealed an admission date of 4/24/26, with diagnoses including protein calorie malnutrition, pressure ulcer right buttock stage three (wound with full thickness tissue loss), diabetes mellitus and high blood pressure.Resident R67's clinical record revealed assessment documentation provided by the contracted wound care specialist as follows:-6/02/26, Right Buttock is a Deep Tissue Pressure Injury (DTI) persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon or purple discoloration Pressure ulcer measured 3.9 cm [centimeters] X 3.2 cm X 0. 1 cm, condition the wound is deteriorating.-6/17/26, follow-up assessment DTI wound to the Right Buttock. Resident with numerous hospital admission with most recent from 6/4/26- 6/12/26. Right Buttock is a Stage Three Pressure Ulcer measured 0.3 cm X 1.0 cm X 0. 1 cm, condition the wound is improving.Review of Resident R67's Discharge Return Anticipated MDS dated [DATE], under Section M0100, Skin Conditions revealed it was coded as having no pressure ulcers and under Section M0300, C. Stage Three Skin Conditions revealed it was coded as having zero.Review of Resident R67's Significant Change MDS dated [DATE], under Section M0100, Skin Conditions revealed it was coded as having no pressure ulcers and under Section M0300, C. Stage Three Skin Conditions revealed it was coded as having zero.During an interview on 7/30/26, at 2:00 p.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed that the wound staging on the above MDS' for Resident R67 were coded incorrectly.28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee28 Pa. Code 211.5(f)(ii)(iv)(ix) Medical records

Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clinical rationale for the continued use of a PRN (as needed) psychotropic (affecting the mind) medication beyond 14-days and failed to provide evidence that non-pharmacological interventions (interventions attempted to calm a resident other than medication) were attempted prior to the administration of a PRN psychotropic medication for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R58). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Use of Psychotropic Medications dated 2/2025, revealed Non Pharmacological approaches must be attempted, and documented . and Psychotropic medication used on a PRN basis must have a diagnosed specific condition and indication for PRN use documented in the medical record and is limited to 14 days with no exceptions. If new order is believed necessary by ordering provider, the resident must be evaluated .with needed documentation in the medical record. Review of Resident R58's clinical record revealed an admission date of 5/23/25, with diagnoses that included dementia (a disease that affects short term memory and the ability to think logically), anxiety (a condition that causes a person to be nervous, uneasy, or worried about something or someone), and Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease (a condition when stomach acid repeatedly flows back up into your throat). Review of Resident R58's June 2025, Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed a physician's order for Ativan 0.5 mg (milligrams) give one tablet every four hours as needed for 14 days with an order date of 6/10/25, and an end date of 6/24/25. Further review revealed a physician's order for Ativan 0.5 mg give one tablet every four hours as needed for 14 days with an order date of 6/24/25. Review of Resident R58's clinical record lacked evidence of a clinical rationale for continued use for the Ativan order dated 6/24/25. Review of documentation on Resident R58's MAR revealed that the PRN Ativan was used on 6/10/25, 6/11/25, 6/12/25, 6/13/25, 6/14/25, 6/16/25, 6/17/25, and 6/18/25. The clinical record revealed that there was no evidence of non-pharmacological interventions attempted prior to the administration of the PRN Ativan for the eight administrations in June 2025. During an interview on 7/2/25, at 12:30 p.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed that Residents R58's PRN Ativan order dated 6/24/25, lacked a clinical rationale for continued use and that Resident R58's clinical record lacked evidence that non-pharmacological interventions were being attempted prior to administering the Ativan. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services

Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident was offered the opportunity to participate in the development, review, and/or revision of their person-centered care plan for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident R6). Findings include: Review of facility policy dated 2/2025, entitled Skilled Nursing - Comprehensive Care Plans indicated the resident will be notified of his/her right to request meetings, revisions to care plan, and to be informed in advance of changes to care plan. The policy further stated that the resident has the right to refuse to participate in the development of his/her care plan and medical and nursing treatments. When such refusals are made, appropriate documentation will be entered into the residents clinical records in accordance with established policies. Resident R6's clinical record revealed an admission date of 11/27/24, with diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation (an abnormal, rapid heartbeat that is present all the time, causing shortness of breath, heart palpitations, and weakness and can lead to development of blood clots), Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD - condition that happens when stomach acid flows back up into the esophagus and causes heartburn), and fractures right humerus (broken bone in upper arm). Resident R6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care needs), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD-a look back period of time for the MDS assessment) of 6/11/25, revealed that Resident R6 was cognitively intact. During an interview with Resident R6 on 6/30/25, at approximately 2:49 p.m. resident reported that he/she has not been invited to attend a care plan meeting nor had he/she recalled attending one since their admission meeting. Resident R6's clinical record lacked any evidence that a care plan meeting was scheduled or that the resident was invited to or attended a care plan meeting since 2/25/25. During an interview on 7/2/25, at 9:57 a.m. Social Worker (SW) Employee E1 confirmed that there was no evidence that a care plan meeting had been held for Resident R6 since 2/25/25. SW Employee E1 further stated that a care plan meeting is to be held at least every 90 days (90th day was 5/26/25) and it has been greater than 90 days (37 days past 90 days) since the facility has had a care plan meeting for Resident R6. 28 Pa. Code 201.29(a) Resident rights

Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician's orders and resident Resuscitation Authorization (a legal document specifying the resident/responsible party choices regarding life-sustaining treatments) were consistent for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident R18). Findings include: A facility policy entitled Resident Rights Advance Directives POLST Resuscitation Code Status dated 2/2025, revealed Resuscitation Code Status is the individual's preference regarding CPR [Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation-CPR-emergency life-saving procedure that is done when breathing or a heartbeat has stopped and when performed immediately can double or triple chances of survival after cardiac arrest] and other lifesaving procedures. Resident R18's clinical record revealed an admission date of [DATE], with diagnoses that include diabetes (a health condition that is caused by the body's inability to produce enough insulin), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (when your lungs do not have adequate air flow), and high blood pressure. Review of Resident R18's clinical record revealed a Resuscitation Authorization dated [DATE], for Do Not Resuscitate (DNR- allow natural death) signed by Resident R18. Review of physician's orders revealed an order dated [DATE], for Full Code (CPR to be initiated). During an interview with Resident R18 on [DATE], at 1:05 p.m. he/she revealed that they did not want CPR performed when his/her breathing or heartbeat has stopped and expressed their wishes were to allow natural death. During an interview on [DATE], at 2:29 p.m. the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that Resident R18's physician's orders and Resuscitation Authorization were not consistent with each other. The DON also confirmed that Resident R18's physician's orders and Resuscitation Authorization should reflect Resident R18's Advance Directive wishes and be consistent with each other. 28 Pa. Code 201.18 (b)(1) Management 28 Pa. Code 201.29(a) Resident rights 28 Pa. Code 211.5(f)(i) Medical records

Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative, in writing regarding the reason for transfer to the hospital and to ensure that a bed-hold notice was provided to the resident's responsible party for three of 18 residents reviewed (Residents R24, R37, and R40) and failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider upon transfer to the hospital for two of 18 residents reviewed (Residents R24 and R40). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Skilled Nursing-Bed hold, last reviewed 2/2025, revealed that before a resident/patient is transferred to the hospital/goes on therapeutic leave, the community will provide to the resident and/or the resident representitive written information that specifies the duration of the state bed hold policy, if any, during which the resident is permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing community. The reserve bed payment policy in the state plan policy, if any. The community policies regarding bed-hold periods to include allowing a resident to return to the next available bed. Conditions upon which the resident would return to the community. Resident R37's clinical record revealed an admission date of 8/17/24, with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease with late onset dementia (a gradual decline of cognitive functioning affecting a persons memory and behaviors starting after [AGE] years of age), history of myocardial infarction (blockage of blood flow to the heart muscle), kidney disease, and elevated blood pressure. A nurse's note for Resident R37, dated 3/22/25, at 6:08 p.m. revealed that the resident was sent to the hospital for evaluation after a fall and returned 3/28/25. There was no documented evidence that written notification of the transfer was provided to Resident 37 and the resident's representative and no documented evidence that a bed-hold notice was provided to the resident's responsible party as required. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 7/1/25, 12:35 p.m. confirmed that a written notification of hospital transfer was not provided to Resident R37 and their representative, and that a bed-hold notice was not provided to Resident R37's responsible party as required. Review of Resident R24's clinical record revealed an admission date of 5/1/24, with diagnoses that included diabetes (a health condition that is caused by the body's inability to produce enough insulin), congestive heart failure (the inability of the heart to maintain an adequate supply of blood to organs and tissues), and high blood pressure. Resident R24's clinical record revealed a progress noted dated 1/2/25, at 4:11 p.m. identifying a transfer to the hospital. The clinical record lacked evidence that his/her necessary clinical information was communicated to the receiving health care provider. The clinical record also lacked evidence indicating that the resident and/or their representative was provided with a copy of the facility bed-hold policy upon transfer. Review of Resident R40's clinical record revealed an admission date of 7/15/22, with diagnoses that included hypothyroidism (a condition when the thyroid produces low amounts of thyroid hormones), diabetes, and Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease (a condition when stomach acid repeatedly flows back up into your throat). Resident R40's clinical record revealed a progress noted dated 12/23/24, at 8:05 p.m. identifying a transfer to the hospital. The clinical record lacked evidence that his/her necessary clinical information was communicated to the receiving health care provider. The clinical record also lacked evidence indicating that the resident and/or their representative was provided with a copy of the facility bed-hold policy upon transfer. During an interview on 7/2/25, at 12:30 p.m. the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that there was no evidence that Residents R24 and R40 and/or their representatives were provided with a copy of the facility bed-hold policy that included the cost per day. The DON confirmed that there was no evidence that Residents R24 and R40's necessary clinical information was provided to the receiving healthcare provider upon transfer. The DON also confirmed when the transfers occurred the resident and/or his/her representative should have been provided with bed hold policy and clinical information should be provided to the receiving healthcare provider upon transfer. 28 Pa. Code 201.29(c.3)(2) Resident rights 28 Pa. Code 201.18(e)(1) Management

Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for hospice services for one of two hospice residents reviewed (Resident R58). Findings include: Review of Resident R58's clinical record revealed an admission date of 5/23/25, with diagnoses that included dementia (a disease that affects short term memory and the ability to think logically), anxiety (a condition that causes a person to be nervous, uneasy, or worried about something or someone), and Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease (a condition when stomach acid repeatedly flows back up into your throat). Review of Resident R58's clinical record contained documentation that he/she had a routine hospice provider and services were being provided. Further review of Resident R58's clinical record lacked evidence of a physician's order for hospice services. During an interview on 7/1/25, at 2:33 p.m. the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that Resident R58 was receiving hospice services and Resident R58's physician's orders lacked an order for hospice services. The DON also confirmed that there should be a physician's order for hospice services. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services 28 Pa. Code 211.5(f)(i) Medical records

Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident R7). Findings include: Review of facility policy dated 2/2025, entitled Skilled Nursing - Comprehensive Care Plans indicated that a comprehensive person - centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychological needs is developed for each resident. The policy further stated that the Care Planning / Interdisciplinary Team is responsible for the review and updating of care plans when there has been a significant change in the resident's condition; when the resident has been readmitted to the facility from a hospital stay; and at least quarterly. Resident R7's clinical record revealed an admission date of 7/4/23, with diagnoses that included stroke (occurs when blood flow to the brain is blocked or a blood vessel inside or on the surface of the brain bursts causing brain cells to die often times leading to permanent disabilities), high blood pressure, and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD-condition that happens when stomach acid flows back up into the esophagus and causes heartburn). Resident R7's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 11/6/24, for Insulin Glargine (medication used to treat diabetes - a health condition caused by the body's inability to produce enough insulin) 26 units subcutaneously (sq - a short needle is used to inject a drug into the tissue layer between the skin and the muscle) every morning due to new onset diabetes. Resident R7's clinical record further revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD - a look back period of time for the MDS assessment) of 11/13/24, and 2/12/25, and an annual MDS with an ARD of 5/5/25, indicating Resident R7 received insulin injections during the look-back period. Resident R7's clinical record lacked evidence that a care plan had been developed to address his/her new onset diabetes and usage of insulin. During an interview on 7/1/25, at 2:32 p.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed that a care plan had not been developed to address Resident R7's new onset diabetes and use of insulin. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(3)(5) Nursing services

Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately discard outdated medications for one of three medication carts reviewed and one of two medication rooms reviewed (Avonia Springs medication room and medication cart). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Medication Storage dated 2/2025, revealed Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations . and Outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications . are immediately removed from stock, disposed of according to procedures for medications . Review of manufacturer's guidelines revealed that an open vial of Tubersol should be discarded within 30 days after opening. Observation of drug storage on 6/30/25, at 12:45 p.m. of the Avonia Springs medication room revealed an open opened vial of Tubersol (a solution used for tuberculosis testing upon admission and employment) with an open date of 4/4/25. Further observations of the Avonia Springs medication cart revealed an open bottle of heartburn relief (an over the counter supplement that helps heartburn) with an expiration date of 4/2023, an open bottle of senna plus (an over the counter supplement for constipation) with an expiration date of 9/2024, and an open bottle of docusate sodium (an over the counter supplement for constipation) with an expiration date of 1/2024. During an interview on 6/30/25, at the time of observation Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E2 confirmed that the bottles of heartburn relief, senna plus, and docusate sodium were beyond their expiration dates and the open vial of Tubersol had an open date of 4/4/25. RN Employee E2 also confirmed that the bottles of heartburn relief, senna plus, docusate sodium and the vial of Tubersol should have been discarded. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1) Management 28 Pa. Code 211.9(a)(1) Pharmacy services 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1) Nursing services

Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the most recent Department of Health Survey results were in a place readily accessible to residents and visitors for five of five neighborhoods (Eagle Ridge, [NAME], Avonia Springs, Blue [NAME], and Sandpiper). Findings include: Observations conducted on 7/1/25, between 10:10 a.m. and 10:17 a.m. on each neighborhood of the facility revealed that the State Department of Health Survey binders lacked information / results from the State Surveys of 8/8/24, and 5/28/25, for residents and visitors to examine. During an interview on 7/1/25, at 11:25 a.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the State Survey binders did not have the reports for all surveys, certifications, and complaint investigations made during the three preceding years, and any plan of correction in effect for residents and visitors to access and examine. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code 201.18(e)(1) Management

Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for one of 19 residents (Resident R65) and failed to provide a resident and his/her representative with a summary of the baseline care plan for one of 19 residents (Resident R175). Findings include: A facility policy entitled Skilled Nursing-Baseline Care Plans dated 2/01/24, revealed a baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate needs and provide instructions needed to provide effective and person centered care shall be developed within 48 hours of the resident's admission, and the resident/representative will be provided a summary of the baseline care plans in a form or manner that is easily understood to include initial goals, medications, treatment, and diet. Resident R65's clinical record revealed an admitted [DATE], with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where there is not enough oxygen in your body), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (a nervous system disease that weakens muscles and impacts physical function), severe protein-calorie malnutrition (a form of malnutrition that lacks dietary protein in severe proportions), and gastrostomy (a surgical procedure used to insert a tube through the abdominal wall for nutrition). Review of Resident R65's clinical record lacked evidence that a baseline care plan was developed. During an interview on 8/07/24, at 1:20 p.m. the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed there was no evidence that a baseline care plan was developed for Resident R65. Resident R175's clinical record revealed an admitted [DATE], with diagnoses including fractured left leg, irregular heartbeat, high blood pressure, heart failure, and speech disturbances. Resident R175's clinical record lacked evidence that a summary of the baseline care plan was provided to Resident R175 and their representative. During an interview on 8/07/24, at 11:00 a.m. the DON confirmed there was no evidence that a summary of the baseline care plan was provided to Resident R175 and their representative. 28 Pa. Code 211.10(c) Resident care policies 28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services

Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure recommendations made from the consultant pharmacist were acted upon for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident R36). Findings include: A facility policy entitled Documentation and Communication of Consultant Pharmacy Recommendations dated 2/01/24, revealed that recommendations are acted upon and documented by the community staff and/or the prescriber. Resident R36's clinical record revealed an admitted [DATE], with diagnoses including Lewy Body dementia (disease associated with abnormal deposits of a protein in the brain), high blood pressure, falls, difficulty speaking, and moderate agitation. Resident R36's clinical record revealed a pharmacy consultant recommendation dated 7/03/24, for an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS-rating scale that was to measure involuntary muscle/nerve movements) assessment be completed. Further review of Resident R36's clinical record revealed a lack of evidence that the pharmacist recommendation dated 7/03/24, for an AIMS assessment was completed by facility staff. During an interview on 8/08/24, at 9:42 a.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed there was no evidence that the pharmacy recommendation for an AIMs assessment for Resident R36 was completed. 28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services

Based upon observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications subject to abuse were stored in a separately locked, permanently affixed compartment in one of five medication refrigerators (Blue [NAME]). Findings include: Observation on 8/08/24, at 9:30 a.m. revealed a locked refrigerator in the Blue [NAME] Medication Room that contained an unopened multi-dose vial of liquid Lorazapam (antianxiety medication) that was not stored in a separately locked, permanently affixed compartment. During an interview at the time of the observation, Licensed Practical Nurse Employee E2 confirmed that the refrigerator lacked a separately locked, permanently affixed compartment to store medications subject to abuse. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services

Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of seven residents observed for medication administration (Resident R227). Findings include: A facility policy entitled Infusion Therapies dated 2/01/24, revealed that flushing is performed prior to each infusion to access vascular device function. The procedure policy revealed to obtain and review a legal prescriber's order. Resident R227's clinical record revealed an admitted [DATE], with diagnoses including spinal abscess, bacterial infection of the backbone, Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA- type of bacteria that's developed resistance to medications) infection, and resistance to Vancomycin (antibiotic used to treat severe but susceptible bacterial infections) related antibiotics. Resident R227's clinical record contained a physician's order to administer Vancomycin 750 mg intravenously (IV- inserted directly into the vein) every eight hours. There was no physician's order for flushing the IV prior to and after administration of medication. Observation during medication administration on 8/05/24, at 2:05 p.m. revealed that Registered Nurse Employee E1 cleansed Resident R227's IV tubing port and instilled 10 milliliters of saline solution and proceeded to go through the steps of administering the Vancomycin. During an interview on 8/06/24, at 2:39 p.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed that Resident R227's clinical record lacked a physician's order for IV flushes before and after Vancomycin administration. 28 Pa Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services 28 Pa Code 211.10(c) Resident care policies

Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain sanitary food service operations for one of six kitchens (Blue [NAME] kitchen). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled, Dietary-Sanitization dated 2/01/24, indicated that the dishwashing machines must be operated using the following specifications: High-Temperature Dishwasher (Chemical Sanitization) a. Wash temperature (150 degrees-165 degrees Fahrenheit (F)) for at least forty-five (45) seconds. b. Rinse temperature (165 degrees-180 degrees F) for at least twelve (12) seconds. Upon observation of the Blue [NAME] kitchen dish machine on 8/06/24, at 12:40 p.m. it was confirmed that the dish machine was a High Temperature hot water dishwasher machine. Further observations for approximately 10 minutes at that time, revealed the temperature dial for the rinse cycle was not functioning with the dial needle not moving and resting on 0. During an interview, on 8/06/24, at 12:50 p.m. it was confirmed by the Director of Dining Servcies, that the Blue [NAME] kitchen dish machine temperature for the rinse cycle was unable to be assessed due to the temperature dial not functioning, and additionally was unable to ensure rinse temperatures met the required 180 degrees F for proper sanitation. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code 211.6(f) Dietary services

Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident R42). Findings include: Review of Resident R42's clinical record revealed an admitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease (brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills and, eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks), muscle weakness, and speech disturbances. Review of Resident R42's clinical record revealed a progress note dated 8/25/23, indicating a blister was noted to the right heel. Most recent physician's order for wound care dated 8/31/23, indicated treatment of Cavilon skin prep (type of treatment to address skin care/damage) one time per day to Resident R42's right heel. Resident R42's clinical record also revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/13/23, Section M0210 entitled Unhealed Pressure Ulcer / Injuries coded as Resident R42 having one or more unhealed pressure ulcers / injuries. The clinical record lacked evidence that a care plan had been developed to address Resident R42's pressure ulcer to his/her right heel. During an interview on 9/29/23, at 11:34 a.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed that a care plan had not been developed to address Resident R42's pressure ulcer to his/her right heel. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(3)(5) Nursing service

Based on review of facility policy, clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a written summary of the baseline care plan was provided to residents and/or the resident's representative for four of 19 residents reviewed (Residents R49, R259, R260, and R262). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled, Skilled Nursing-Baseline Care Plans dated 2/2/23, revealed, The resident/representative will be provided a summary of the baseline care plan in a form or manner that is easily understood to include initial goals, medications, treatment, and diet. Review of Resident R49's clinical record revealed an admitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included senile degeneration of brain, (loss of intellectual ability due to the deterioration of brain cells); dementia, (symptoms affecting memory, thinking, and social skills), anxiety, (feelings of tension, worried thoughts and physical changes like increased blood pressure), and depression, (mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness and a lack of interest). Review of Resident R49's clinical record lacked evidence that a written summary of the baseline care plan was provided to the resident and/or resident representative. Review of Resident R259's clinical record revealed an admitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included heart failure, atherosclerosis (the buildup of fats, cholesterol and other substances that can cause arteries to narrow, blocking blood flow), diabetes, and high blood pressure. Review of Resident R259's clinical record lacked evidence that a written summary of the baseline care plan was provided to the resident and/or resident representative. Review of Resident R260's clinical record revealed an admitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included lung cancer, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD-lung disease where the tubes that carry air become swollen and irritated, which causes increased mucus and wheezing, making it difficult to breathe), chronic kidney disease (a loss of kidney function over time, causing toxins/poisons to build up in the blood). Review of Resident R260's clinical record lacked evidence that a written summary of the baseline care plan was provided to the resident and/or resident representative. Review of Resident R262's clinical record revealed an admitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included diverticulosis of large intestine (condition where small pouches/bulges form in the wall of the intestine, developing weakened areas, which can leak intestine contents into the blood), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (bleeding that occurs from the digestive tract), and atrial fibrillation (an irregular, and very rapid heart rhythm that can lead to development of blood clots). Review of Resident R262's clinical record lacked evidence that a written summary of the baseline care plan was provided to the resident and/or resident representative. During an interview on 9/29/23, at 11:31 a.m. the Director of Nursing and Nursing Home Administrator confirmed there was no evidence that a written summary of the baseline care plan was provided to Residents R49, R259, R260, R262 and/or their representative. 28 Pa. Code 201.24 (e)(4) Admissions Policy

Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to discard an expired [MEDICATION(S)] (TB) solution for two of two medications rooms observed ([NAME] and Eagle Pass). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled, Medication Storage In The Facility, dated [DATE], with a policy review date of [DATE], indicated that Certain medications or package types, such as multiple dose injectable vials once opened, require an expiration date shorter than the manufacturer's expiration date to insure medication purity and potency. Review of manufacturer's instructions on the box of TB solution indicated to Discard 30 days after opening. Observation of Eagle Pass Medication Room on [DATE], at 11:30 a.m. revealed one open, previously used vial of TB solution with no opened date marked and no use by date marked on the vial. An interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E1 at the time of the observation, confirmed that the vial was opened with no opened or use by date and should not be in the refrigerator for use. Observation of [NAME] medication storage room on [DATE], at 11:40 a.m. revealed one open, previously used vial of TB solution with an opened date of [DATE], with no use by date marked on the vial. The vial was in the refrigerator 99 days past the opened date. During an interview on [DATE], at 11:43 a.m. LPN Employee E2, confirmed that the vial was opened on [DATE], and should not be in the refrigerator for use. 28 Pa. Code 211.9(a)(1) Pharmacy services 28 Pa. Code 211.10(c) Resident care policies 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services

Based on review of clinical records and facility documentation, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to weigh a resident as ordered by the physician for one of 14 residents reviewed (Resident R18). Findings include: Review of Resident R18's clinical record revealed an admitted [DATE], with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of Resident R18's clinical record revealed a physician's orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of Resident R18's recorded weights revealed that the resident was weighed as follows: 08/29/22 179.0 pounds 09/12/22 251.2 pounds 09/19/22 251.1 pounds 09/19/22 251.1 pounds 10/02/22 158.8 pounds 10/05/22 155.0 pounds 10/12/22 155.0 pounds 10/16/22 155.0 pounds 10/19/22 155.6 pounds Review of the above weights with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 10/20/22, at 10:02 a.m. revealed that the weight entered on 9/12/22, and both weights entered on 9/19/22 were entered in error and are not confirmed weights for Resident R18. There was no other documented weekly weights between the confirmed weight on 8/29/22, to the confirmed weight on 10/02/22, indicating a lack of weekly weights. During an interview on 10/20/22, at 10:02 a.m. the DON confirmed that weights for Resident R18 were not completed weekly after admission as ordered by the physician. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services

Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient staff with appropriate competencies to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services on two of five units (Avonia and Blue [NAME]). Findings include: During an interview with the Director of Nutritional Services on 12/6/21, at 2:40 p.m. revealed that dietary staff were transporting meals from the main kitchen to the units to be served from the dining areas on each unit. As there were only three dietary aides that were available to serve the meals, two of the five units utilized nursing staff to plate the foods and distribute the meals to the residents on their unit. Observations on Avonia on 12/06/21, at 5:00 p.m. revealed nursing staff plating food without hairnets. During an interview on 12/06/21, at 5:09 p.m. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E1 and Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E2 confirmed they were not wearing hairnets. LPN Employee E1 stated I know we should (wear hairnets) but there were not any up here and no one from the kitchen is available to come up and help, they're short staffed down there too. During an interview on 12/08/21, at 4:50 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that there is a staffing shortage in the kitchen and the nursing staff on some units are plating food in the unit. During an interview on 12/09/21, at 8:51 a.m. NA Employee E3 stated that dietary brings the food to the unit, the nursing staff plate the food and serve the residents the meals and then retrieve the plates and organizes the dirty dishes for the dietary staff to place in the unit dishwashers on Avonia. NA Employee E3 also stated that the nursing staff will cook eggs for residents, make toast, grilled cheese and peanut butter sandwiches during meal service. During an interview on 12/09/21, at 8:58 a.m. LPN Employee E4 stated that there are usually three staff on the unit. one nursing staff plates the food, another takes the food to the resident and one staff is on the unit for resident's needs on Avonia. LPN Employee E4 also stated that there has been a staffing issue in the kitchen for at least six months. During an interview on 12/09/21, at 9:01 a.m. LPN Employee E5 stated that the dietary staff bring the food up, the nursing staff plates the food, serve the food and cleans up the tables and retrieves room trays. LPN Employee E5 also stated that there has been no education from the kitchen on the appropriate serving of the food since their hire. During an interview on 12/09/21, at 9:17 a.m. NA Employee E6 stated that they had not received any formal training on how to serve meals on the unit from the hot plates. Observation of meal service on 12/09/21, revealed that three of the five units were utilizing nursing staff to serve the breakfast meal to residents. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) management

Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were signed and dated at required visits for one of six residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident R56). Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled Physician Services-Attending Physician Qualifications and Conditions, dated 3/02/21, indicated that physicians are required to provide resident visits on admission, monthly for the first three months, and every 60 days thereafter, writing a meaningful and legible progress note at each visit. The policy further indicated that orders will be reviewed and renewed at each regulatory visit and in accordance with state regulations. Review of Resident R56's clinical record revealed an admitted [DATE], with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of Resident R56's clinical record included physician progress notes [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Resident R56's 'paper' clinical record revealed one signed set of physician orders dated 4/21/21, and no other set of signed physician's orders in the electronic health record. During an interview on 12/09/21, at 8:35 a.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed that Resident R56's physician's orders were not reviewed and signed during required physician visits conducted on 5/03/21, 7/03/21, 9/02/21, and 11/04/21. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code 211.2(a) Physician services 28 Pa. Code 211.5(f)(h) Clinical record 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(3)(5) Nursing services