Deficiency Index

LECOM at Asbury Ridge dba Saint Mary's Asbury Ridg

Erie, Pennsylvania · CCN 396081

17 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
48
Surveys
17
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file14/17

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
80
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
LECOM SENIOR LIVING
County
Erie
Medicare-certified since
2002
Ownership changed
In the last 12 months

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=15, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Sep 12, 2025

423 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.214.44
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.32—

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD375.0%E125.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 4 of the 48 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at LECOM at Asbury Ridge dba Saint Mary's Asbury Ridg, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Nov 18, 2022

    Based on review of facility policies, review of manufacturer recommendations, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards and to maintain dish machine water temperatures in accordance with manufacturer recommendations for food service safety in the main kitchen. Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Dietary Infection Control, dated March 1999, with a policy review date of 1/17/22, indicated, it is the policy of the facility to maintain infection control measures to prevent cross contamination or infection. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF675Nov 30, 2023

    Based on review of PAHAN 694, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained the resident's psychosocial well-being for six of 24 residents reviewed (Residents R68, R26, R53, R56, R57, and R65). Findings include: Review of the 2023 PAHAN 694 5-11-UPD UPDATE encourages the use of masks until no new cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection have been identified for 14 days. From 11/27/23, through 11/28/23, during resident interviews, the following residents complained of an inability to communicate with masked staff members: During interview on 11/27/23, at 11:10 a.m. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Feb 19, 2021

    Based on observations, review of facility policies, clinical records, and Pennsylvania Department of Health Guidance and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately perform hand hygiene during a wound dressing change for one of eighteen residents (Resident R29) and failed to prevent possible cross contamination related to a catheter (tube placed into the bladder to facilitate urination) for one of 18 residents (Resident R42) and failed to follow infection control protocol regarding the use of wearing N-95 (filtering facepiece respirator) masks while working in designated potential quarantined rooms for COVID-19 for one of eight residents (Resident R4). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF761Sep 12, 2025

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to label multi-dose containers of Tuberculin solution (used to test for the disease tuberculosis) with the date they were opened in one of two medication storage rooms. Findings include: Observation on 9/10/25, at 10:15 a.m. of a medication storage refrigerator revealed an opened and undated multi-dose vial of Tuberculin solution. During an interview on 9/10/25, at 10:20 a.m. Licensed Practical Nurse Employee E1 confirmed that the multi-dose vials of Tuberculin solution should have been labeled with the date it was opened. During an interview on 9/10/25, at 10:35 a.m. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Jan 6, 2025

    Based on review of the hospice/facility agreement and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain current information related to Hospice services for one of three residents reviewed (Closed Record Resident CR1). Findings include: A Hospice Care Services Agreement dated 2/08/06, indicated that, Hospice shall communicate with facility to ensure coordination of patient care services; Hospice Health Aides shall provide a copy of the completed assignment form to the facility; facility and Hospice each shall prepare and maintain records concerning patients receiving services under this agreement; and such records shall be available for review and inspection by each party as necessary for the treatment of patients under this agreement. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 48 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Sep 12, 2025Standard1 finding
  • Jan 6, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 30, 2023Standard2 findings
  • Nov 18, 2022Standard3 findings
  • Jan 12, 2022Standard2 findings
  • Feb 19, 2021Standard6 findings
  • Dec 4, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jul 11, 2019Standard2 findings
Show the 9 earlier surveys
  • Apr 4, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 23, 2017Standard8 findings
  • Apr 19, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • May 4, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Jun 19, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Jul 25, 2014Standard2 findings
  • Jun 14, 2013—1 finding
  • Jul 13, 2012—10 findings
  • Jun 24, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction