Glenwood Village Care Center
Glenwood, Minnesota · CCN 245402
21 surveys since 2010, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 94
- Surveys
- 21
- Harm or worse
- 5
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. 1 of these were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 64
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- VIVIE
- County
- Pope · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1986
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 123 not-for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Minnesota.
Last survey on record
Dec 8, 2025
336 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.17 | 4.22 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.61 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 93.1% | 42.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J26.3% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G13.1% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2062.5% | E412.5% | F412.5% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C13.1% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6894×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F8043×
Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F6772×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Glenwood Village Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Oct 22, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to implement immediate interventions to prevent re-occurrence following a fall from a full body (EZ Way) mechanical lift for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (R4) who sustained two brain bleeds and a fracture. This resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ). In addition to the resident in immediate jeopardy, the facility failed to implement person centered fall interventions and complete a fall analysis for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (R1) who had multiple falls and fractures identified which resulted in actual harm.The immediate jeopardy began on 10/16/25, when R4 returned to the facility from a hospital stay related to her injuries that were sustained after she fell from the fully body mechanical lift during a transfer and upon… […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Aug 25, 2023
Based on interview and document review the facility failed to follow care plan fall interventions for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for falls. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining serious injuries requiring hospitalization and surgery. Due to complication related to the surgery, R1 died . This failure resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) for R1. The immediate jeopardy began on [DATE] at 1:00 p.m., when R1 rolled out of bed, fell on to the floor, and sustained fractures of the hip, pelvis and humerus (long bone in the arm runs from shoulder to the elbow). R1 was hospitalized , underwent surgery to repair her hip fracture and died due to complications from the fractures. The administrator and director of nursing (DON) were notified of the immediate jeopardy on [DATE] at 4:45 p.m. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jan 10, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to follow manufacturer's guidelines for a full body mechanical lift by ensuring the loops were secured to the hook on the lift, prior to lifting the resident for transfer for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed. This resulted in actual harm when the hook came off the lift and R1 fell to the floor sustaining a large hematoma to the side of his head, a skin tear to finger and required an emergency department (ED) visit. Findings include: R1's care plan dated 6/15/23, indicated R1 had impaired functional status related to hemiparesis, history of stroke and had limited ability to complete activities of daily living (ADLs), dependent on staff for assistance, and utilized a wheelchair and mechanical lift. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF760Mar 7, 2022
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for 1 of 3 residents (R1), when R1's medication change was omitted for 7 days. This resulted in harm when R1 was hospitalization and had a decline in activities of daily living (ADLs) as a result of the error. Findings include: R1's significant change Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1's diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Further review of MDS indicated R1 had no cognitive impairments and required extensive assistance by one staff member for activities of daily living (ADLs) such as bed transfers, ambulation, dressing and toileting. Review of facility report to the State Agency (SA) dated 2/10/22, indicated R1 received an order on 2/3/22, with medication changes. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 21, 2025
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure refrigerated food items were properly labeled, dated, and closed after the packaging was opened to prevent cross contamination which had the potential to affect all 63 residents currently residing in the facility. In addition, the facility failed to ensure refrigerated food items were disposed of after the expiration date. Findings include: During the initial tour of the main kitchen and kitchenettes on 5/19/25 at 11:22 a.m., with the dietary manager (DM)-A, the following areas of concern were identified and confirmed by DM-A: kitchen refrigerator: -Thirteen sandwiches were covered with plastic on a try, undated. -one bag cabbage wrapped, undated. […]
Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 94 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Dec 8, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Oct 22, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- May 21, 2025Standard and complaint16 findings
- Jan 10, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 15, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Mar 13, 2024Standard4 findings
- Aug 25, 2023Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 10, 2023Standard6 findings
Show the 13 earlier surveys
- Mar 7, 2022Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 18, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jul 22, 2021Standard7 findings
- May 10, 2019Standard4 findings
- May 10, 2018Complaint3 findings
- Mar 15, 2018Standard7 findings
- Feb 23, 2017Standard2 findings
- Mar 3, 2016Standard2 findings
- Feb 4, 2015Standard7 findings
- Dec 5, 2013—5 findings
- Oct 25, 2012—9 findings
- Dec 1, 2011—6 findings
- Nov 5, 2010—7 findings · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction