Frazee Care Center
Frazee, Minnesota · CCN 245299
24 surveys since 2011, 11 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 160
- Surveys
- 24
- Harm or worse
- 11
- Immediate jeopardy
- 4
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 42
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- HEALTH DIMENSIONS GROUP
- County
- Becker · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1985
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 123 not-for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Minnesota.
Last survey on record
Jan 7, 2026
306 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.33 | 4.22 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.03 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 36.8% | 42.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D433.3% | E650.0% | F18.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C18.3% |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Frazee Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jun 16, 2023
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 6 residents (R1, R2, R3) were appropriately re-assessed to safely smoke independently at the facility and failed to ensure implementation of smoking interventions. This resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy when R1 sustained fourth degree burns to the left side of face, left side of neck, left shoulder, left arm, left chest, left abdomen, and left upper leg when she was left outside to smoke with out a smoking apron on, dropped a spark from her cigarette on her left side which set fire to her clothing. The immediate jeopardy began on 6/10/23, at approximately 7:55 p.m. when R1 was found by staff outside the facility, under a covered patio, on fire resulting in hospitalization and fourth degree burns. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF578Mar 2, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident advance directives were accurately documented in the clinical record to reflect the residents' current wishes which affected 1 of 17 residents (R20) reviewed for advanced directives. This deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) for R20 who would have received cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), contrary to their wishes, in the absence of a pulse or respirations. The IJ began on [DATE], when R20's electronic health record (EHR) main screen and orders identified R20 was to have CPR however, R20's updated POLST signed on [DATE], identified R20's wishes of do not resuscitate (DNR). […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Nov 4, 2021
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement appropriate foot wear and use of a gait belt during transfers for 1 of 1 residents (R1) reviewed for falls. These findings resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation for R1 when R1 fell during a transfer while wearing regular socks and staff were not using a gait belt. R1 required surgical repair of the [CONDITION(S)]. All residents have the potential for serious injury, impairment or death with improper use of transfer devices and improper footwear. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF692Sep 24, 2021
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to complete comprehensive, accurate and ongoing nutritional assessments for 4 of 5 residents (R20, R24, R31, R30) who had experienced significant weight loss. R20 sustained actual harm when the facility failed to identify, assess and implement interventions in a timely manner to prevent continued weight loss while receiving all nutrition via tube feeding. R20 R20's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R20 had severe cognitive impairment and had diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . R20's MDS indicated she required extensive assistance with dressing, personal hygiene and bed mobility and had a feeding tube with 51% or more of total calories received through the tube feeding. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF851Feb 13, 2024
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to submit complete and accurate data for staffing information based on payroll during Quarter 4 (July 1st-September 30th, 2023) to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), according to specifications established by CMS. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 33 residents residing in the facility. Finding include: Reviews of the Payroll-Based Journal Report (PBJ) [NAME] report 1705D Quarter 4 from 7/1/23-9/20/23, identified excessively low weekend staffing. Review of the staffing timecards identified staff, their position, and total hours worked. During the review of time cards from 7/1/23-9/20/23, revealed a shortage on 7/23/23, from 3:20 p.m. […]
Read 29 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 29 of 160 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 7, 2026Standard1 finding
- Nov 6, 2024Standard3 findings
- Feb 13, 2024Standard and complaint7 findings
- Feb 1, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jun 16, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Mar 2, 2023Standard6 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 27, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Nov 4, 2021Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
Show the 16 earlier surveys
- Sep 24, 2021Standard12 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 24, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Oct 8, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Apr 20, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jan 16, 2020Standard6 findings
- Mar 27, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Oct 19, 2018Standard16 findings
- Dec 8, 2017Standard20 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 24, 2016Standard21 findings · 3 harm
- Nov 23, 2015Standard and complaint10 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 12, 2014Standard12 findings
- Jun 26, 2014Standard4 findings
- Nov 26, 2013Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
- Aug 2, 2013—8 findings
- Sep 21, 2012—8 findings
- Jun 13, 2011—12 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction