Benedictine Care Community
Ada, Minnesota · CCN 245502
23 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2025.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 85
- Surveys
- 23
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 49
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- BENEDICTINE HEALTH SYSTEM
- County
- Norman · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1987
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 123 not-for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Minnesota.
Last survey on record
Jun 10, 2026
152 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.16 | 4.22 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.75 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 60.4% | 42.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $154,460 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J13.6% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G13.6% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1760.7% | E414.3% | F517.9% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6773×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F6843×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F5802×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F5852×
Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Benedictine Care Community, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Aug 28, 2026
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and appropriately secure an exit door to prevent an elopement for 1 of 3 resident (R1) reviewed for elopement. This resulted in immediate jeopardy (IJ) when R1 left the facility without staff knowledge and was not located for approximately three hours.The immediate jeopardy began on [DATE] at 10:41 p.m., when R1 exited the facility through the north assisted living door. At 1:40 a.m., R1 was located laying in a row of trees across the road approximately 288 yards away from the facility. The administrator and director of nursing (DON) were notified of the immediate jeopardy on [DATE] at 5:10 p.m. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Mar 5, 2026
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to identify and act on a change of condition for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who was care planned for potential infections, had a fever and was experiencing hallucinations which was an atypical symptom. This delay in treatment resulted in an immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for R1 when she was diagnosed with sepsis and was hospitalized . The IJ began on 2/21/26, when R1's vital signs indicated a temperature of 101.7 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and she was demonstrating other signs of illness such as vomiting, visible shaking, hallucinations, disruptive behavior, reports of pain, and crying with no nursing assessment conducted and the provider was not contacted. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Sep 25, 2025
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents (R1) received necessary medical attention following a change in a left hip surgical incision. Additionally, the facility failed to comprehensively assess, monitor, and document skin changes. R1 sustained actual harm and required hospitalization, surgery, and insertion of a peripherally inserted central line catheter (PICC) for intravenous (IV) antibiotic treatment for sepsis. Findings include: R1's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], identified mechanical ground level fall after losing her balance and sustained a left subtrochanteric femur fracture. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF725Jun 10, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet residents' assessed needs and provide required care and services. The facility's staffing shortages resulted in delayed toileting assistance, delayed eating assistance, loss of dignity, and transfers performed contrary to assessed needs and facility policy for 2 of 6 residents (R23, R24) reviewed in the sample requiring staff assistance with quality-of-care needs. The facility's ongoing staffing shortages had the potential to affect all 36 residents residing in the facility. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jun 10, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program that included a system for preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable diseases. Specifically, the facility failed to timely initiate and consistently implement transmission-based precautions for 2 of 2 residents (R12. R24) reviewed who exhibited signs and symptoms of potentially infectious diarrhea; failed to consistently identify and monitor residents exhibiting signs and symptoms of potential infection through the facility's surveillance system for 2 of 2 residents (R7, R24) reviewed for infection surveillance; failed to ensure staff adhered to infection prevention practices related to hand… […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 85 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 28, 2026Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 10, 2026Standard11 findings
- Mar 5, 2026Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 22, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Sep 25, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 21, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Apr 9, 2025Standard4 findings
- Feb 8, 2024Standard2 findings
Show the 15 earlier surveys
- Dec 20, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Mar 22, 2023Standard1 finding
- Aug 30, 2022Standard1 finding
- Jul 7, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Feb 19, 2021Standard7 findings
- Dec 14, 2017Standard1 finding
- Jul 11, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Oct 6, 2016Standard10 findings
- Apr 4, 2016Complaint5 findings
- Nov 25, 2015Standard10 findings
- Oct 23, 2014Standard4 findings
- Dec 19, 2013—3 findings
- Oct 4, 2012—2 findings
- Dec 16, 2011—2 findings
- Feb 11, 2011—5 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction