Culpeper Health & Rehabilitation Center
Culpeper, Virginia · CCN 495279
21 surveys since 2010, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 211
- Surveys
- 21
- Harm or worse
- 5
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 180
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- LIFEWORKS REHAB
- County
- Culpeper
- Medicare-certified since
- 1993
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 73 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Virginia.
Last survey on record
Jul 29, 2025
468 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.34 | 3.34 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.29 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 59.2% | 50.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $16,298 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J11.9% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3465.4% | E1528.8% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C23.8% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6563×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6843×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6953×
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F6572×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Culpeper Health & Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jul 10, 2024
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide adequate supervision for residents smoking and leaving the building, for five of 50 residents in the survey sample; Residents #148, #90, #97, #120, and #136. 1. For Resident #148, the facility staff failed to provide resident supervision and safety for smoking. Resident #148 was assessed on the Smoking Safety Screen dated 3/8/24 and 6/8/24 as requiring supervision for smoking. On 7/8/24 at 3:00 PM, Resident #148 was observed smoking in an outdoor garden area with raised plant beds. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF600Jul 29, 2025
Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure three of five residents were free from verbal abuse, Residents #3, #4 and #5.The findings include:1. For Resident #3 (R3), the facility staff failed to protect the resident from verbal abuse from a staff member. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date of 7/6/25, the resident scored 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was not cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657Jul 29, 2025
Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for three of five residents in the survey sample, Residents #3, #4, and #5. The findings include: 1. For Resident #3 (R3), the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan after a staff member verbally abused the resident. The comprehensive care plan dated 2/5/25 was reviewed. It failed to evidence any documentation related to the resident being verbally abused by a staff member. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF745Jul 29, 2025
Based on resident interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provided medical related social services for three of five residents in the survey sample, Residents #3, #4 and #5. The findings include: 1. For Resident #3 (R3), the facility staff failed to provide medically related social services after an incident of verbal abuse by a staff member. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date of 7/6/25, the resident scored 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was not cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF842Jul 29, 2025
Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for three of five residents, Resident #3, #4, and #5. The findings include: 1. For Resident #3 (R3), the facility staff failed to document in the clinical record, an incident between the resident and a staff member. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date of 7/6/25, the resident scored 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was not cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. […]
Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 211 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 29, 2025Complaint5 findings
- Mar 13, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Jul 10, 2024Standard and complaint23 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 8, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Sep 15, 2022Standard and complaint14 findings
- Aug 31, 2021Complaint2 findings
- May 19, 2021Standard8 findings
- Sep 30, 2020Infection control1 finding
Show the 13 earlier surveys
- Nov 5, 2019Standard and complaint15 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 20, 2018Standard15 findings
- Aug 9, 2017Standard10 findings
- Feb 1, 2017Complaint5 findings
- Aug 24, 2016Complaint9 findings
- Jul 14, 2016Standard and complaint22 findings · 2 harm
- Aug 27, 2015Standard and complaint18 findings
- Apr 1, 2015Complaint4 findings
- Aug 28, 2014Standard16 findings
- Sep 13, 2013—8 findings
- Aug 17, 2012Standard18 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 2, 2011—13 findings
- Oct 7, 2010—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction