Deficiency Index

Ayer Valley Rehab and Nursing

Ayer, Massachusetts · CCN 225421

33 surveys since 2011, 12 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
166
Surveys
33
Harm or worse
12
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse12

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file24/33

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
123
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
STERN CONSULTANTS
County
Middlesex
Medicare-certified since
1990

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
3
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 80 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Massachusetts.

Last survey on record

Jun 25, 2026

137 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.653.64
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.77—
Annual nurse turnover58.1%40.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$63,034 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG78.6%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD4353.1%E1822.2%F89.9%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B11.2%C44.9%
CMS’s current file: 81 of the 166 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5804×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F7254×

    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.

  • F8804×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5573×

    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.

  • F6563×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Ayer Valley Rehab and Nursing, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF580Mar 5, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to notify the Physician/Non Physician Practitioner (NPP: Nurse Practitioner) of changes in condition related to a pressure wound for one Resident (#60) out of a total sample of 26 residents, who was identified to be at risk for skin breakdown. Specifically, the facility staff failed to notify the Physician/NPP when: 1. The Resident developed a pressure injury (PI: localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence presenting as intact skin) on his/her left hip on 2/6/24. 2. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Mar 5, 2024

    Based on record and policy review, and interview, the facility failed to provide necessary pressure ulcer (PU: localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence) treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing for one Resident (#60), out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to: 1. Adequately assess Resident #60's change in skin condition when the Resident was identified to have a PU on his/her left hip. 2. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Sep 27, 2023

    Based on records reviewed, review of facility surveillance camera video footage, and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for care, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was free from abuse from a staff member. Review of the surveillance camera video footage from 08/24/23 during the evening shift, showed Resident #1 pick up a cup containing yellow-tinted liquid off a medication cart, put it up to his/her mouth, Nurse #1 quickly goes over to him/her, grabs the cup of liquid from Resident #1's hand and throws the liquid into Resident #1's face, and Nurse #1 also engaged in a verbal altercation with him/her, the incident was witnessed by another staff member who stepped into intervened. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF557Jul 5, 2023

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who was cognitively intact, made his/her own decisions, who resided in a room where he/she occupied and enjoyed having the bed closest to the window, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was treated in a dignified and respectful manner, when on 06/08/23 at approximately 2:30 P.M., while Resident #1 was off the unit and outside the facility participating in a scheduled smoke break, Unit Manager #1 directed unit staff to change his/her room (which included moving all of his/her personal belongs) to one in which he/she would then occupy the bed closest to the door. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF580Jun 16, 2022

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff notified the physician of: (1) A change in the treatment plan, specifically a missed hemodialysis (procedure used to remove waste and fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working) visit, for one Resident (#205) out of one applicable sampled resident, and (2) A change in condition, specifically a new pressure ulcer, for one Resident (#88) out of three applicable sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #205 was admitted to the facility in June 2022 with the following Diagnoses: [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

Read 32 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 32 of 166 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 25, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • May 28, 2026Standard14 findings
  • Mar 13, 2025Standard18 findings
  • Jan 2, 2025Complaint3 findings
  • Jun 5, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 5, 2024Standard22 findings · 2 harm
  • Dec 29, 2023Complaint13 findings
  • Sep 27, 2023Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
Show the 25 earlier surveys
  • Jul 5, 2023Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 11, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 2, 2023Infection control3 findings
  • Jun 16, 2022Standard17 findings · 3 harm
  • Jun 7, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 16, 2022Complaint3 findings
  • Jan 11, 2022Complaint5 findings
  • Jun 30, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 1, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Oct 20, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Aug 25, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jan 9, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 24, 2019Standard9 findings
  • Jan 30, 2019Complaint5 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 11, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 6, 2018Standard5 findings
  • Apr 19, 2017Standard6 findings
  • Dec 5, 2016Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
  • Oct 5, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 8, 2016Standard7 findings
  • Dec 1, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Sep 25, 2013—5 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 11, 2012—5 findings
  • Feb 28, 2012—1 finding
  • Feb 16, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction