Deficiency Index

Ansted Center

Ansted, West Virginia · CCN 515133

22 surveys since 2009, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
135
Surveys
22
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
1
The record, 2009–2026
’09’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file17/22

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
60
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
GENESIS HEALTHCARE
County
Fayette
Medicare-certified since
1994

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
2
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 29 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in West Virginia.

Last survey on record

Mar 26, 2026

228 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day2.983.50
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.07—
Annual nurse turnover53.2%39.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$16,448 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ12.4%K—L—
Actual harmG24.9%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2458.5%E1126.8%F37.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 41 of the 135 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5842×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6282×

    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.

  • F6442×

    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Ansted Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Oct 3, 2024

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the residents with an environment free from abuse from other residents. Resident #9 was physically abused by Resident#159. Resident #159 slapped Resident #9in the face. This was determined as Past Non-Compliance immediate jeopardy. Immediate jeopardy was determined to begin on 06/22/24 and was abated on 07/11/24. Resident identifiers: #159, #9. Facility census: 60. Findings included: a) Resident #159 During a medical record review on 09/30/24 at approximately 10:30 AM, it was found that Resident #159 was admitted on [DATE]. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Oct 3, 2024

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed to identify risk factors and provide care and services that are resident centered to prevent falls with injury and to ensure medications were administered as ordered. This was true for 3 (three) of 6 (six) residents reviewed for the Long Term Care Survey Process. Facility census: 60. Resident identifiers: Resident #162, Findings include: a) Resident #162 On 10/01/24 at approximately 03:30 PM, a record review was started for Resident #162 which reveal that Resident #162 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] status post hospitalization for an unwitnessed fall that occurred at home. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF692Jul 12, 2023

    Based on observation, policy review, family interview, staff interview and medical record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who received nutrition through a Gastrostomy tube (G-tube) received sufficient caloric intake daily to prevent weight loss. Harm occurred when the resident experienced a significant weight loss and G-tube feedings were held. The G-tube feedings were held to encourage the resident to eat by mouth, but the facility failed to have a plan in place to ensure caloric intake would be maintained if the resident did not eat by mouth. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed who receive nutrition via a G-tube. Resident #55. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF803Mar 26, 2026

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed as posted in the facility and as printed on resident tray cards. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers: #15, #21, #25, #30, #37, and #54. Facility Census: 59. Findings included: a) The Lunch Menu posted for 03/23/2026 included: -Salisbury Steaks w/Gravy-Scalloped Potatoes-California Blend Vegetables-Dinner Roll-Brown Sugar Glazed Angel Food Cakeor-Kielbasa-Scalloped Potatoes-California Blend Vegetables-Dinner Roll On 03/23/26 at 12:00 PM, the posted menu, tray cards, and food service errors were reviewed with the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) viewed posted menu, tray card and food errors and the… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 26, 2026

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and in a manner that prevents foodborne illness to the residents. This failed practice has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. FACILITY:FACILITY. Facility Census: 59. Findings included: a) On 03/23/2026 at 10:30 AM, an initial kitchen investigation was initiated with Account Manager #69. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 135 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 26, 2026Standard15 findings
  • Oct 30, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • May 28, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 3, 2024Standard and complaint13 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 12, 2023Standard and complaint10 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 20, 2022Standard8 findings
  • Feb 9, 2021Standard2 findings
  • Jun 9, 2020Infection control1 finding
Show the 14 earlier surveys
  • Oct 23, 2019Standard7 findings
  • Sep 24, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 8, 2018Standard8 findings
  • Dec 6, 2017Standard5 findings
  • Nov 9, 2016Standard6 findings
  • Apr 20, 2016Complaint4 findings
  • Sep 2, 2015Standard9 findings
  • Jun 4, 2014Standard5 findings
  • Dec 11, 2012—11 findings
  • Feb 2, 2011—7 findings
  • Nov 5, 2010—2 findings
  • Nov 13, 2009—3 findings
  • Sep 24, 2009Complaint5 findings
  • Aug 5, 2009Complaint10 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction