Deficiency Index

Glenville Health & Rehab

Glenville, West Virginia · CCN 515103

23 surveys since 2009. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2020.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
172
Surveys
23
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2009–2026
’09’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse4

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file18/23

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
65
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
HILL VALLEY HEALTHCARE
County
Gilmer · rural
Medicare-certified since
1989

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
2
Staffing
2
Quality measures
1

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 29 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in West Virginia.

Last survey on record

Apr 16, 2026

207 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.063.50
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.41—
Annual nurse turnover54.1%39.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$39,390 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG12.0%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3058.8%E1937.3%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C12.0%
CMS’s current file: 51 of the 172 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6563×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6573×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5842×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6092×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Glenville Health & Rehab, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 26, 2026

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were transferred according to their assessed plan of care and/or orders. This was true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for accidents during a complaint survey. Resident identifier: #68. Census: 65. This failed practice let to Resident #68 being transferred by only one staff member which resulted in harm. As a result of the inappropriate transfer, Resident #68 experienced an arterial bleed, was sent out to the hospital, and required orthopedic surgical consultation. Resident #68 ranked her pain as a 10 out of 10 at the time of the incident. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Oct 24, 2024

    Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide treatment or services to prevent and heal pressure ulcers for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The resident suffered actual physical harm when further avoidable facility acquired pressure ulcers developed. Resident identifier: #61 Facility Census: 63. Findings included: a) Resident #61 Resident #61 was admitted on [DATE] with the following identified skin issues noted on the Nursing Admission Evaluation dated 07/03/24: Resident #61 had a deep tissue injury measuring 5 centimeters (cm) X 4.5 cm to the left heel. Resident #61 had a pressure ulcer measuring 1 cm X 1.5 cm to the right side of the coccyx. A wound was also noted on the left-hand middle finger. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF610Aug 26, 2026

    Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure complete and thorough investigations were completed for an injury of unknown origin and resident-to-resident physical abuse incidents. This was true for three (3) of four (4) residents sampled for abuse concerns during the complaint survey process. Resident Identifiers: #67, #65, #60 and #23. Facility Census: 65.a) Policy Review A review of the facility policy titled Abuse, with a revision date of 10/20/22, revealed Part Six (6) Section A read as follows: -The organization will maintain systems to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF644Apr 16, 2026

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to enusre they referred a resident with a newly evident mental disorder to the appropriate state-designated authority for review. This was found to be true for three (3) of eight (8) residents sampled during the long term care survey process. Resident identifiers: #3, #5, #12. Facility census: 63 Findings included: a) Resident #3 Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].The resident had the following diagnoses on admission: -PARKINSON'S DISEASE WITHOUT DYSKINESIA, WITHOUT MENTION OF FLUCTUATIONS 07/25/25 Principal Diagnosis admission POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER, CHRONIC Medical Management 07/25/25 History During the stay at the facility, the resident had a new diagnosis of: -MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, SINGLE… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF645Apr 16, 2026

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's Pre-admission Screening (PAS) reflected pre-admission diagnoses for four (2) of eight (8) resident reviewed for the category of PASARR, during the long-term care survey. Resident identifiers: #4, and #5, Facility Census: 63. a) Resident #5 This resident was first admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a re-admission date of 07/17/24. Upon admission, the resident had these diagnoses: -ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE, UNSPECIFIED 3/4/2021 Principal Diagnosis admission -UNSPECIFIED CONVULSIONS 03/3/2021 admission -MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, SINGLE EPISODE, UNSPECIFIED 03/03/2021 admission The PASARR was completed on 03/01/21 in an acute care facility. The PASARR did not contain any of the above diagnoses. […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 172 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 26, 2026Complaint6 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 16, 2026Standard15 findings
  • Oct 24, 2024Standard18 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 21, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 13, 2023Complaint4 findings
  • Feb 28, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 30, 2022Standard13 findings
  • Jun 23, 2021Standard12 findings
Show the 15 earlier surveys
  • Jan 7, 2020Complaint5 findings · 2 harm
  • Jun 19, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 24, 2019Standard22 findings
  • May 17, 2018Standard7 findings
  • Dec 28, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 30, 2017Standard9 findings
  • Oct 13, 2016Complaint6 findings
  • Feb 5, 2016Standard11 findings
  • Oct 14, 2015Complaint7 findings
  • Jan 16, 2015Standard9 findings
  • Sep 28, 2013—3 findings
  • Jul 18, 2013—10 findings
  • Jun 18, 2012—1 finding
  • Mar 15, 2012—6 findings
  • Aug 26, 2009—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction