Deficiency Index

F949 citations in Minnesota

Administration Deficiencies

Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

F949 in Minnesota. Pick another state for the same tag.

Against expectation — 2025

Minnesota cites F949 more often than its own record predicts

Versus expected share1.08×

1.08 times the share F949 takes of citations nationally.

Share of Minnesota citations0.08%

Of every deficiency written in Minnesota in 2025, this is the portion that was F949.

Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.

In the surveyor’s words

What Minnesota surveyors wrote

F949 findings written in Minnesota, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.

Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.

E · No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternSeptember 16, 2026

Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 8 of 8 staff (registered nurse (RN)-D, RN-E, nursing assistant (NA)-A, NA-B, and NA-C, NA-D, NA-E, and the social services coordinator (SSC) had received initial and/or annual training on Alzheimer's disease or related disorders, assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL), problem solving with challenging behaviors, and communication skills.Findings include: Review of the facilities current Course Report identified they had 3 mandatory courses available for training: Comprehensive View of DementiaChallenging Behaviors: Care and Interventions for Individuals Experiencing Dementia. Alzheimer's Disease: The Facts Review of the social service coordinator's (SSC) employee file identified they had a hire date of 2/21/26. …

Luther Haven

The short window

Recent years

YearShare of Minnesota citationsvs expected
20240.16%1.94×
20250.08%1.08×

Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.

What else Minnesota surveyors cite →

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction