F940 in Connecticut. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Connecticut cites F940 more often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share3.18×
3.18 times the share F940 takes of citations nationally.
Share of Connecticut citations0.31%
Of every deficiency written in Connecticut in 2025, this is the portion that was F940.
Connecticut0.31%
National0.10%
Share of all citations that were F940.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Connecticut surveyors wrote
F940 findings written in Connecticut, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
F · No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadSeptember 2, 2026
Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation, review of facility policies and procedures, and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop and/or implement an effective training program to ensure nursing staff received education necessary to provide care and services related to the prevention, identification, and treatment of pressure ulcers/injuries. The findings inlcude:The review of the Facility Assessment, last updated 4/1/26, found that at any given time, 15 to 20 residents in the facility were dependent on staff for all mobility needs, which increased their risk of pressure ulcer/injury development. …
C · No harm, potential for minimal, widespreadAugust 26, 2025
Based on review of facility documentation, review of facility policies and procedures and interviews for the facility reviewed for training requirements, the facility failed to ensure that an effective training program was developed, implemented, and maintained for all individuals providing services under a contractual arrangements met the multiple training topic requirements prior to, and while providing ongoing services in the facility according to the facility assessment and regulatory guidance. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction