Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide all residents with functioning call lights system when call lights for four resident rooms affecting three residents (Resident #1, #3, and #4) did not sound at the door nurses' station and when the call light for one resident (Resident #1) did not have a call light cover present. The facility census was 74.Review of the facility policy, Resident Call System and Accessibility, dated 10/15/26, showed the following:-To ensure that all residents are provided with a functioning, operation, and accessible communication system to summon staff assistance, maintain autonomy, and ensure safety from bedsides, toilets, and bathing facilities;-The facility shall maintain an adequately equipped resident call system that… …
F919 citations in Missouri
Call system · Environmental Deficiencies
Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2025
Missouri cites F919 less often than its own record predicts
0.77 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Of every deficiency written in Missouri in 2025, this is the portion that was F919.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Missouri surveyors wrote
F919 findings written in Missouri, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
The short window
Recent years
| Year | Share of Missouri citations | vs expected |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0.52% | 1.19× |
| 2024 | 0.66% | 1.49× |
| 2025 | 0.35% | 0.77× |
Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.
What else Missouri surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction