Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the facility's binding Arbitration Agreement was explained and understood by the resident and/or their representatives and to inform the resident and/or their representative of the 30 days to rescind the agreement if they so wished to do so. This was true for 39 of 43 residents in the facility. This had the potential for residents to make a misinformed decision when the agreement was not explained. Findings include: The facility's Admission Arbitration Agreement Policy, dated 9/1/23, documented during the admission process, the facility's team member shall provide a clear explanation of the arbitration process to the resident and their legal representative. …
F847 citations in Idaho
Administration Deficiencies
Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2023
Idaho cites F847 more often than its own record predicts
9.36 times the share F847 takes of citations nationally.
Of every deficiency written in Idaho in 2023, this is the portion that was F847.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Idaho surveyors wrote
F847 findings written in Idaho, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
What else Idaho surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction