Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on record reviews and interviews, for three (4) of 49 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to ensure that residents and or their representatives understood the binding arbitration agreements made between the residents and /or their representatives and the facility. Residents #125, ##27, #33, and #127.The findings included:A review of the facility's most recent admission packet included the following binding arbitration agreement for residents and the facility that documented: Resident-Facility Binding Arbitration Agreement[Name of Facility] and [Resident's Name](Resident, or :Resident Legally Authorized Representative (hereinafter, collectively, Resident) understand and agree that any dispute, disagreement, controversy,… …
F847 citations in District of Columbia
Administration Deficiencies
Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
No F847 citations were recorded in District of Columbia for 2025. That means none appear in the CMS file for that year — not that the requirement does not apply.
In the surveyor’s words
What District of Columbia surveyors wrote
F847 findings written in District of Columbia, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
What else District of Columbia surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction