Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food that accommodated a documented food allergy for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for dietary services. Resident 1 experienced harm when the resident was served food which contained an ingredient to which they were allergic, and the resident required medical intervention and monitoring. This failure placed other residents at risk for allergic reaction and medical complications. Findings included. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], was alert and oriented, and was their own responsible party.Review of Resident 1's Electronic Medical Record (EHR) showed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], was alert and oriented, and was their own responsible party. …
F806 citations in Washington
Allergies and food preferences · Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2025
Washington cites F806 less often than its own record predicts
0.71 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Of every deficiency written in Washington in 2025, this is the portion that was F806.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Washington surveyors wrote
F806 findings written in Washington, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
Based on observation, interview, and record the facility failed to ensure resident dietary preferences were accommodated for 1 of 1 meal services observed and for 4 of 6 residents reviewed for food (Residents 50, 4, 9, & 8). This failure placed residents at risk for unwanted food items and frustration.Findings included.<Resident 50>According to the 06/13/2026 Quarterly MDS, Resident 50 had medically complex diagnoses including diabetes (a disease making control of blood sugar more difficult).In an interview on 08/11/2026 at 7:18 AM Resident 50 expressed frustration with the food he was served by the facility. Resident 50 stated they were not supposed to have juice because they were diabetic and juice was sugary. …
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide food in accordance with preferences for 3 of 6 residents (Residents 68, 94, and 95) reviewed during meal service. This failure placed residents at risk for potential dissatisfaction with meals and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Observation of the lunch meal service on 02/06/2024 revealed the primary lunch meal consisted of hot dog on a bun, seasoned potato wedges or mashed potatoes, vegetable blend and Jello with whipped topping. Observation on 02/06/2024 at 11:36 AM, showed Staff L, Dietary Aide (DA), prepared all Jello cups using a gray scoop. Resident 68 Observation of tray line during the lunch meal on 02/06/2024 at 12:26 PM, showed Resident 68's tray card had a preference of 1/2 dessert portion. …
The short window
Recent years
| Year | Share of Washington citations | vs expected |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0.43% | 1.07× |
| 2024 | 0.55% | 1.40× |
| 2025 | 0.28% | 0.71× |
Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.
What else Washington surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction