Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were not provided with foods that they were allergic to for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1), resulting in an allergic reaction for the resident. This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance.Findings include:The facility's policy regarding a nutrition assessment, dated August 13, 2025, indicated that a nutrition assessment would be completed for each resident admitted to the facility. …
F806 citations in Pennsylvania
Allergies and food preferences · Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2025
Pennsylvania cites F806 more often than its own record predicts
1.38 times the share F806 takes of citations nationally.
Of every deficiency written in Pennsylvania in 2025, this is the portion that was F806.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Pennsylvania surveyors wrote
F806 findings written in Pennsylvania, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
Based on select facility policy, observation, a review of clinical records, review of planned menus, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined the facility failed to provide food that accommodated residents' preferences for one resident out of 31 residents reviewed (Resident 15).Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Food Preferences last reviewed by the facility on January 29, 2026, indicated that individual food preferences will be assessed upon admission and communicated to the interdisciplinary team. The policy stated that upon admission, dietary or nursing staff will identify a resident's food preferences. …
Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food and drink to accommodate residents' individualized preferences for two of 25 sampled residents. (Residents 14, 28)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 14 had diagnoses that included diabetes and heart failure. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident had no cognitive impairment. Review of the resident's breakfast meal ticket on December 17, 2025, at 9:15 a.m., revealed that she was to receive apple juice, scrambled egg, bacon, toast with diet jam or jelly, and one cinnamon roll. The resident was observed with orange juice, scrambled egg, bacon and toast. …
The short window
Recent years
| Year | Share of Pennsylvania citations | vs expected |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0.51% | 1.25× |
| 2024 | 0.51% | 1.30× |
| 2025 | 0.54% | 1.38× |
Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.
What else Pennsylvania surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction