F687 in Minnesota. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Minnesota cites F687 less often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share0.67×
0.67 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Share of Minnesota citations0.12%
Of every deficiency written in Minnesota in 2025, this is the portion that was F687.
Minnesota0.12%
National0.17%
Share of all citations that were F687.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Minnesota surveyors wrote
F687 findings written in Minnesota, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedApril 10, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure podiatry services were obtained or 1 of 1 resident (R8) reviewed for foot care.
Findings include:
R8's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified she could make herself understood, was independent with eating, required supervision with transfers and bed mobility. R8's interview for preferences identified it was very important to choose what clothing to wear and take care of personal belongings. Diagnoses included heart failure, diabetes and dementia.
R8's MHM BIMS Staff Assessment (staff assessment of cognition) dated 2/18/25, identified memory recall was ok after five minutes and R8 seemed to recall long past. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction