F687 in Maryland. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Maryland cites F687 less often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share0.38×
0.38 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Share of Maryland citations0.07%
Of every deficiency written in Maryland in 2025, this is the portion that was F687.
Maryland0.07%
National0.17%
Share of all citations that were F687.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Maryland surveyors wrote
F687 findings written in Maryland, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
G · Actual harm, isolatedAugust 29, 2024
Based on record review, review of hospital records, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate treatment for an identified foot concern that resulted in harm to the resident. This was found evident in 1 (Resident # 296) out of 1 resident reviewed for foot care.
The findings include:
On 8/14/24 at 12:22 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #296's medical record. The review revealed that Resident #296 was admitted to the facility in early 2017 and had a past medical history that included, but not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage), hyperlipidemia (too many lipids/fats in blood which can clog arteries) and dementia. …
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedOctober 9, 2025
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure consultations were timely scheduled and wound care was consistently performed. This was evident for 1 (Resident #3) out of 1 resident reviewed for foot care during the facility's recertification survey.The findings include:On 10/1/25 at 9:05AM during an interview with Resident #3 they expressed that dressing changes were not occurring at the frequency they were supposed to occur due to there not being enough nursing staff available to perform the dressing changes and additionally, that their specialist appointments for the care of their foot had not yet been set up by facility staff although staff were expressing to them that they were taking care of the scheduling of the appointments. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction