Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 53 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that the discharge needs of the resident was identified and resulted in the development of a discharge plan for the resident; that regular re-evaluation to identify changes that required modification to the discharge plan was completed; and referrals to local agencies for the purpose of returning to the community were documented. Specifically, the resident desired to transfer to another long term care facility closer to family and the facility did not follow-up with the resident or family for the transfer. Resident identifier: 7. …
F660 citations in Utah
Discharge planning · Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2024
Utah cites F660 more often than its own record predicts
2.47 times the share F660 takes of citations nationally.
Of every deficiency written in Utah in 2024, this is the portion that was F660.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Utah surveyors wrote
F660 findings written in Utah, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
The short window
Recent years
| Year | Share of Utah citations | vs expected |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0.23% | 0.99× |
| 2024 | 0.52% | 2.47× |
Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.
What else Utah surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction