Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective discharge planning process for 1 (#26) of 1 sampled resident, who was discharged to another long-term care facility. Findings include: Review of resident #26's care plan, dated 4/23/24, showed the resident was a long-term resident. The interventions showed resident #26 wanted to go live closer to her daughter, to go home, or to go to an assisted living facility. Review of resident #26's nursing notes showed resident #26 eloped from the facility secured unit on the following dates: - 5/23/24, - 8/4/24, - 8/27/24. Review of resident #26's electronic medical record nursing notes, dated 12/19/24, failed to show any notes for the upcoming discharge for resident #26. …
F660 citations in Montana
Discharge planning · Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2025
Montana cites F660 more often than its own record predicts
2.00 times the share F660 takes of citations nationally.
Of every deficiency written in Montana in 2025, this is the portion that was F660.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Montana surveyors wrote
F660 findings written in Montana, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
The short window
Recent years
| Year | Share of Montana citations | vs expected |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0.85% | 3.62× |
| 2024 | 0.35% | 1.67× |
| 2025 | 0.16% | 2.00× |
Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.
What else Montana surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction