Based on observations, interviews, record review, and a review of the facility policy titled Discharge Summary and Plan, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process for one of two Residents (R) R6 reviewed for discharges. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure documentation that R6 had been asked about their interest in receiving information regarding returning to the community, updating the resident's comprehensive care plan and discharge plan, and if discharge to the community was determined not to be feasible, ensuring to document who made the determination and why. …
F660 citations in Georgia
Discharge planning · Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2025
Georgia cites F660 less often than its own record predicts
0.73 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Of every deficiency written in Georgia in 2025, this is the portion that was F660.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Georgia surveyors wrote
F660 findings written in Georgia, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
The short window
Recent years
| Year | Share of Georgia citations | vs expected |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0.17% | 0.73× |
| 2024 | 0.27% | 1.28× |
| 2025 | 0.06% | 0.73× |
Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.
What else Georgia surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction