Deficiency Index

F660 citations in Texas

Discharge planning · Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies

Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

F660 in Texas. Pick another state for the same tag.

Against expectation — 2025

Texas cites F660 less often than its own record predicts

Versus expected share0.40×

0.40 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.

Share of Texas citations0.03%

Of every deficiency written in Texas in 2025, this is the portion that was F660.

Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.

In the surveyor’s words

What Texas surveyors wrote

F660 findings written in Texas, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.

Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.

J · Immediate jeopardy, isolatedMay 8, 2025

Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process that focused on the resident's discharge goals, the preparation of residents to be active partners and effectively transition them to post-discharge care, and the reduction of factors leading to preventable readmissions for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for discharge planning. The facility failed to implement an effective discharge plan for Resident #1, when FM S reported the resident's home was without electricity. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 04/25/2025 at 5:57 PM. The ADM and DON was notified and provided an IJ template, and a POR (Plan of Removal) was requested. …

Methodist Transitional Care Center-Desoto LLC

G · Actual harm, isolatedNovember 16, 2021

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process that focused on the resident's discharge goals, the preparation of residents to be active partners and effectively transition them to post-discharge care, and the reduction of factors leading to preventable readmissions for 1 of 3 residents (CR #1) reviewed for safe discharge . The facility failed to provide sufficient preparation to ensure safe and orderly discharge of CR#1. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs upon discharge. Findings include: Record review of the admission sheet for CR #1 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. …

Sugar Land Health Care Center

D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedFebruary 10, 2025

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 residents reviewed for discharges. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 had a safe discharge when he left AMA to his home. This failure could place residents at risk of inappropriate transfers and diminished continuity of care. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3 ' s face sheet dated 02/05/25, revealed, admission on 01/30/25 to the facility. Record review of Resident #3 ' s hospital history of physical dated 03/22/24, revealed, a [AGE] year-old male diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and pressure ulcer. …

Edgemere Estates

The short window

Recent years

YearShare of Texas citationsvs expected
20230.13%0.56×
20240.13%0.61×
20250.03%0.40×

Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.

What else Texas surveyors cite →

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction