F645 in Maryland. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Maryland cites F645 less often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share0.70×
0.70 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Share of Maryland citations0.43%
Of every deficiency written in Maryland in 2025, this is the portion that was F645.
Maryland0.43%
National0.61%
Share of all citations that were F645.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Maryland surveyors wrote
F645 findings written in Maryland, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedJuly 6, 2026
Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) form was completed correctly on admission to the facility. This was evident for 1 (Resident #71) of 2 Residents reviewed for PASARR screening during the recertification survey. The findings include:Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) is a federal mandate designed to prevent the inappropriate placement of individuals with Serious Mental Illness (SMI) or Intellectual/Developmental Disabilities (ID/DD) in nursing facilities. …
B · No harm, potential for minimal, patternJune 22, 2018
Based on surveyor review of the clinical records and interview of residents, legal representatives and facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to conduct a new Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) after an individual stayed in the facility more than 30 days than the original plan. A PASRR is a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are appropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care and can also advance person-centered care planning by assuring that psychological, psychiatric, and functional needs are considered along with personal goals and preferences in planning long-term care. This finding was evident for 2 of 2 residents selected for review during the survey (#13 & # 28). The findings include:
1. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction