F645 in District of Columbia. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
District of Columbia cites F645 more often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share2.64×
2.64 times the share F645 takes of citations nationally.
Share of District of Columbia citations1.60%
Of every deficiency written in District of Columbia in 2025, this is the portion that was F645.
District of Columbia1.60%
National0.61%
Share of all citations that were F645.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What District of Columbia surveyors wrote
F645 findings written in District of Columbia, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedJune 16, 2026
Number of residents sampled:
Number of residents cited:
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility's staff failed to ensure that a resident's PASSAR II referral was completed within 30 days of admission for one (1) of 53 sampled residents. (Resident #150). The findings included:Resident #150 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Unspecified Psychosis, Anxiety Disorder, and Major Depressive Disorder.A review of the resident's medical record revealed a PASSAR I form dated 04/09/26 that failed to capture that the resident had a history of a serious mental illness. Additionally, the form was incomplete and failed to document if a referral for a PASSAR II was necessary. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction