Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were informed of their rights both orally and in writing on an ongoing basis for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for Resident Council. This placed residents at risk for not being informed of their rights. Findings include:A review of the Resident Council Meeting Minutes from 6/28/25, 7/25/25, and 8/27/25 revealed resident rights were not reviewed during any of the meetings.On 9/4/25 at 2:08 PM, Staff 27 (Activity Director) stated he did not review resident rights during Resident Council meetings.On 9/5/25 at 10:51 AM, members of the Resident Council confirmed resident rights were not reviewed during the meetings.On 9/8/25 at 11:38 AM, Staff 1 (Administrator) stated the expected resident rights to be… …
F572 citations in Oregon
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2025
Oregon cites F572 more often than its own record predicts
6.14 times the share F572 takes of citations nationally.
Of every deficiency written in Oregon in 2025, this is the portion that was F572.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Oregon surveyors wrote
F572 findings written in Oregon, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
The short window
Recent years
| Year | Share of Oregon citations | vs expected |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.15% | 3.23× |
| 2025 | 0.21% | 6.14× |
Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.
What else Oregon surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction