F568 in Ohio. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Ohio cites F568 less often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share0.78×
0.78 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Share of Ohio citations0.08%
Of every deficiency written in Ohio in 2025, this is the portion that was F568.
Ohio0.08%
National0.10%
Share of all citations that were F568.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Ohio surveyors wrote
F568 findings written in Ohio, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedJuly 16, 2026
Based on record review, staff interviews, review of resident fund accounts, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to appropriately manage resident funds. This affected one (#02) of one resident reviewed for personal funds. The facility census was 55.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #02 revealed an admission date of 10/22/25 with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, hypertension, and type II diabetes mellitus.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #02 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 that indicated the resident was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. …
B · No harm, potential for minimal, patternJune 30, 2026
Based on record review and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure detailed documentation of accounting practices were in place for four (Residents #9, #26, #34, and #38) of five active resident accounts reviewed. The facility census was 59. Findings include: 1. Review of the personal fund statement dated 10/01/25 to 06/03/26 revealed she received credits of $50 and $75 and each of these credits were listed as cash receipts. Interview on 06/22/26 at 12:35 P.M. with Resident #34 revealed she had concerns related to access to money and knowing about the money in her account. 2. Review of Resident #9's personal fund statement dated 10/01/25 to 06/03/26 revealed he received credits of $50 and $75 each of these credits were listed as cash receipts. 3. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction