F568 in North Dakota. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
North Dakota cites F568 more often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share2.77×
2.77 times the share F568 takes of citations nationally.
Share of North Dakota citations0.28%
Of every deficiency written in North Dakota in 2025, this is the portion that was F568.
North Dakota0.28%
National0.10%
Share of all citations that were F568.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What North Dakota surveyors wrote
F568 findings written in North Dakota, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedMay 29, 2025
Based on review of facility policy and family and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide the resident's representative a copy of quarterly financial statements for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #19) reviewed for personal fund accounts. Failure to provide quarterly statements to the individual designated by the resident to make financial decisions on their behalf prevented the representative from verifying transactions and fund balances.
Findings include:
Review of facility policy titled Resident Personal Funds occurred on 05/29/25. This policy, dated May 2024, stated, . …
C · No harm, potential for minimal, widespreadDecember 8, 2022
Based on record review, policy review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a quarterly financial statement for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #2) and 1 supplemental resident (Resident #22) reviewed for personal fund accounts. Failure to provide residents or their representatives with quarterly financial statements prevented the resident or representative from verifying transactions and fund balances.
Findings include:
Review of the facility policy titled Trust Fund Account, dated April 2012, stated, . …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction