F568 in Connecticut. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Connecticut cites F568 more often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share3.13×
3.13 times the share F568 takes of citations nationally.
Share of Connecticut citations0.31%
Of every deficiency written in Connecticut in 2025, this is the portion that was F568.
Connecticut0.31%
National0.10%
Share of all citations that were F568.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Connecticut surveyors wrote
F568 findings written in Connecticut, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
E · No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternJuly 7, 2026
Based on interviews, review of the resident trust accounts, facility documentation, and facility policy for 6 of 6 residents (Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #11, Resident #15, Resident #21, and Resident #84) reviewed for personal funds, the facility failed to ensure quarterly statements were provided to the residents. The findings include:1.Resident #3 had diagnoses that included diabetes, neurogenic bladder, and depression.The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicative of intact cognition. …
B · No harm, potential for minimal, patternAugust 4, 2025
Based on interviews, facility documentation, and facility policy for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #31) reviewed for personal funds, the facility failed to provide quarterly statements to the resident representative for a resident that was severely cognitively impaired. The findings include:Resident #31's diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following other cerebrovascular disease, anoxic brain damage, and localization-related (focal)(partial) idiopathic epilepsy.Review of Resident #31's admission record identified Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and listed Person #1 as the resident representative.The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #31 was severely cognitively impaired and was dependent on staff for self-care and… …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction