Deficiency Index

Westminster-Canterbury of Richmond

Richmond, Virginia · CCN 495096

15 surveys since 2011, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
81
Surveys
15
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2011–2024
’11’15’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file11/15

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
158
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Henrico
Medicare-certified since
1975

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
5
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=15, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Oct 30, 2024

740 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.754.03
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.30—
Annual nurse turnover43.8%39.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD964.3%E—F321.4%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B214.3%C—
CMS’s current file: 14 of the 81 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6252×

    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.

  • F8422×

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

  • F5541×

    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.

  • F5821×

    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.

  • F6561×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Westminster-Canterbury of Richmond, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF625Mar 25, 2021

    Based on interviews and record reviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were provided a written notice which specified the duration of the bed-hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital for one of 25 sampled residents (Resident (R) 33). On 12/29/21, R33 was transferred to the hospital because she developed paralysis and hematuria; however, she was not given the written notice that addressed holding the resident's bed during her absence. Findings include: Review of R33's Physicians Progress Note, dated 12/29/21, located in the resident's EMR under the progress notes tab, revealed the resident was sent to the hospital per her physician's recommendation due to a change in condition. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF803Mar 25, 2021

    Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility menus, it was determined the facility failed to prepare menus to include portion sizes to ensure residents received adequate amounts of menu items to meet their nutritional needs. This failed practice had the potential to affect the nutritional status of the 125 residents in the facility. The facility also failed to ensure menus were not repetitive in food items. Review of the menus revealed chicken in some form was on the menu for lunch and dinner daily four of four residents (Resident (R) 12, R68, R19, and R110) who ccomplained about the lack of variety if food options. Findings include: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 25, 2021

    Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to date foods in the refrigerators according to the facility policy. The facility failed to air dry dishes and pans before being stacked and stored. The facility also failed to date food in resident refrigerators located in the nursing lounge on three of three floors. These failed practices had the potential to affect the 125 residents in the facility. Findings include: 1. Labeling and Dating Review of facility's undated policy titled, Proper Labeling and Dating, all items in refrigerators were to have a date sticker on them. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF658Oct 30, 2024

    Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for documentation for one of four residents in the survey sample, Resident #1. The findings include: For Resident #1 (R1), the facility staff failed to document assessments, interventions, and vital signs in the clinical record on 10/19/24. A review of R1's nurses' progress notes revealed the following: 10/19/24 19:44 (7:44 p.m.) Resident remains lethargic. BP remains low 88/43. Resident responds to tactile and verbal stimuli. Has declined PO (by mouth) this evening. [Name of attending physician] updated. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF842Oct 30, 2024

    Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete, accurate clinical record for one of four residents in the survey sample, Resident #1. The findings include: For Resident #1 (R1), the facility staff failed maintain a complete, accurate medical record by documenting assessments, interventions, and vital signs in the clinical record on 10/19/24. A review of R1's nurses' progress notes revealed the following: 10/19/24 19:44 (7:44 p.m.) Resident remains lethargic. BP remains low 88/43. Resident responds to tactile and verbal stimuli. Has declined PO (by mouth) this evening. [Name of attending physician] updated. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 81 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Oct 30, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 12, 2024Standard4 findings
  • May 25, 2023Standard4 findings
  • Jul 27, 2022Infection control1 finding
  • Mar 25, 2021Standard4 findings
  • Oct 27, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jun 28, 2018Standard2 findings · 2 harm
  • Mar 30, 2017Standard1 finding
Show the 7 earlier surveys
  • Mar 17, 2016Standard5 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 23, 2015Standard and complaint7 findings
  • May 1, 2014Standard8 findings
  • Apr 18, 2013—6 findings
  • May 23, 2012—1 finding
  • Mar 30, 2012Standard29 findings · 2 harm
  • Mar 10, 2011—6 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction