Victoria Gardens of Frisco
Frisco, Texas · CCN 675811
31 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2021.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 84
- Surveys
- 31
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 118
- Ownership
- Government - Hospital district
- Chain
- PRIORITY MANAGEMENT
- County
- Collin
- Medicare-certified since
- 1999
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 104 government-run facilities of 100–127 beds in Texas.
Last survey on record
Jul 9, 2026
123 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.32 | 3.25 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.41 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 46.3% | 48.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $23,546 across 2 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J211.1% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D738.9% | E844.4% | F15.6% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8124×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F5582×
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F5651×
Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Victoria Gardens of Frisco, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Feb 25, 2025
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for accidents. On 2/22/2025 Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A attempted to perform a 1-person transfer, with a Hoyer lift, on Resident #1 who required a 2-person transfer with a Hoyer lift. CNA A was unable to complete the transfer and dropped Resident #1 on the floor. This was determined to be past non-compliance immediate jeopardy from 2/22/2025 to 2/22/2025 due to the facility having implemented actions that corrected the non-compliance prior to the beginning of the survey. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF604Oct 23, 2024
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents the right to be free of any physical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience, and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for restraints. The facility failed on 09/09/24 to ensure Resident #1 remained free of any physical restraint in that: the movement of Resident #1's head and mouth were restricted by physical force applied by the hands of OT A. The noncompliance was identified as past noncompliance (PNC). The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 09/09/24 and ended on 09/09/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the state's investigation began. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Dec 9, 2021
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents receive adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for one (Resident #25) of one resident for elopement. 1 B failed to provide supervision by not conducting required rounds every two hours to count the residents at the beginning of her shift from 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM and every two hours which resulted in Resident #25 eloping and not being found for approximately 8 hours. 2. The Kitchen Staff failed to prevent access to kitchen area which lead to an exit door that exited to an unsecured outside area which resulted in Resident #25 eloping and not being found for approximately 8 hours These failures placed the residents at risk for falls with injuries, hospitalization and even death. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 9, 2026
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen.The facility failed to ensure the dry storage food items were dated, labeled and securely stored.The facility failed to ensure the refrigerator food items were dated, labeled and securely stored.The facility failed to ensure the freezer food items were dated, labeled and securely stored.The facility failed to ensure that canned good food items were free of dents.The facility failed to ensure that the kitchen equipment (steam tray table, floors, ovens, drain) was clean.The facility failed to ensure that dishwashing protocol was followed for the 3-compartment sink.The facility failed… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Dec 9, 2021
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure sanitary practices were maintained in the kitchen as follows: uncovered bulk containers of food and an unsealed food container, past date leftovers. These failures could place residents who eat from the kitchen at risk for cross-contamination and food-borne illness. Findings include: 1. Observation on 12/05/21 at 9:36 a.m. revealed, in the dry storage area a bulk container of cornmeal had no lid and was partially covered with saran wrap. A bulk container of sugar had a lid that was ajar. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 84 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 9, 2026Standard3 findings
- Jan 14, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Dec 8, 2025Complaint1 finding
- May 29, 2025Standard and complaint2 findings
- Feb 25, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Oct 23, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 13, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Apr 18, 2024Standard and complaint3 findings
Show the 23 earlier surveys
- Mar 22, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Dec 16, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Apr 20, 2023Complaint3 findings
- Mar 2, 2023Standard2 findings
- Feb 28, 2022Infection control1 finding
- Jan 5, 2022Complaint4 findings
- Dec 9, 2021Standard and complaint5 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 27, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Sep 30, 2021Infection control4 findings
- Jul 1, 2021Complaint3 findings
- Sep 24, 2020Standard7 findings
- Mar 4, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jun 21, 2019Standard7 findings
- Apr 10, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Mar 6, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Jun 8, 2018Standard and complaint3 findings
- Oct 19, 2017Complaint4 findings
- Aug 11, 2017Complaint3 findings
- Jun 7, 2017Standard6 findings
- Nov 7, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Jun 30, 2016Standard2 findings
- Jun 22, 2012—4 findings
- May 13, 2011—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction