Deficiency Index

Avir at Borger

Borger, Texas · CCN 455989

32 surveys since 2010, 18 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
110
Surveys
32
Harm or worse
18
Immediate jeopardy
11
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy11

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file21/32

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
110
Ownership
Government - Hospital district
Chain
AVIR HEALTH GROUP
County
Hutchinson · rural
Medicare-certified since
1992

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 104 government-run facilities of 100–127 beds in Texas.

Last survey on record

Sep 12, 2025

423 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.193.25
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.55—
Annual nurse turnover60.7%48.1%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$40,307 across 2 penalties
Payment denials
2

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ12.9%K—L—
Actual harmG—H12.9%I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2367.6%E720.6%F25.9%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 34 of the 110 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F7613×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5502×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6092×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Avir at Borger, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Nov 8, 2023

    Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the residents are free from accidents and hazards for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for mechanical lift transfers. LVN A failed to prevent accidents and hazards with Resident #1 from injury and harm by not following mechanical lift standards of a two person assist resulting in severe injuries of a 10+ centimeter laceration on the head revealing skull, a laceration on the hand, and a fractured C1 vertebrae. This failure could affect residents at the facility by placing them at risk for accidents that lead to injuries such as bruising, skin tears, fractures, subdural hematomas, and death. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 11/07/2023 at 2:43 PM. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF760Apr 15, 2022

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free of significant medication errors for 1 of 5 residents (Resident # 1) reviewed for medications. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's hospital discharge medication orders were followed for insulin from his admitted [DATE] until he was found unresponsive and sent to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident #1 was not administered his scheduled insulin at night for 3 nights nor did he receive his insulin per sliding scale three times a day, missing 8 total doses. Resident #1 expired on [DATE]. An Immediate Jeopardy was identified on [DATE] at 4:30 PM as having occurred from [DATE] - [DATE]. […]

  • Actual harm, patternF697Sep 12, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that pain management is provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 (Resident #14) of 12 residents reviewed for pain management.The facility failed to ensure Resident #14 did not have mouth pain from at least March of 2025 to August of 2025.This failure could place residents at risk of living for extended periods of time with unaddressed pain. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Mar 17, 2022

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains as free from accidents hazards as is possible, and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for transfers. LVN A failed to hold the smoke room door open when Resident #1 had two fingers on his left hand squashed between a door jam and the door resulting in a trip to the emergency room and receiving 19 stitches and multiple fractures. This failure could affect all the residents at the facility by placing them at risk for accidents that lead to injuries such as bruising, skin tears, fractures, suffocation, subdural hematomas, and death. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Sep 12, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food service safety.The facility failed to ensure stored food was properly labelled and dated.The facility failed to ensure dented cans were placed in the specified area to be returned.The facility failed to discard leftover food by use by date on the label.The facility failed to ensure the floor, walls, trashcan, and bathroom of the kitchen were clean and sanitized.The facility failed to ensure food was stored at least 6 inches off the floor.These failures could place residents at risk of food borne illness.Findings included:An observation on 08/25/25 at 05:35 AM revealed a meal… […]

Read 37 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 37 of 110 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Sep 12, 2025Standard and complaint12 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 27, 2025Complaint3 findings
  • Jan 29, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 24, 2024Standard3 findings
  • Jun 25, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 22, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Apr 29, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 13, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 24 earlier surveys
  • Jan 17, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 8, 2023Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 7, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 7, 2023Standard5 findings
  • May 11, 2022Standard1 finding
  • Apr 15, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 17, 2022Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 31, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 2, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 6, 2019Standard9 findings
  • Dec 6, 2018Standard2 findings
  • Nov 8, 2018Complaint3 findings
  • Aug 15, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • May 3, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 11, 2018Standard3 findings
  • Dec 7, 2016Standard1 finding
  • Oct 29, 2014Standard7 findings
  • Nov 14, 2013—10 findings · 4 harm
  • Oct 14, 2013—5 findings · 5 harm
  • Jun 3, 2013—2 findings
  • Nov 29, 2012—9 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 6, 2011—3 findings
  • Mar 3, 2011—7 findings · 4 harm
  • Nov 18, 2010—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction