Deficiency Index

Greenville Gardens

Greenville, Texas · CCN 675367

28 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
118
Surveys
28
Harm or worse
10
Immediate jeopardy
5
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy5

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file22/28

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
103
Ownership
Government - Hospital district
Chain
OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT
County
Hunt
Medicare-certified since
1994

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
1
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 104 government-run facilities of 100–127 beds in Texas.

Last survey on record

Aug 13, 2025

453 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day2.723.25
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.41—
Annual nurse turnover39.6%48.1%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$16,206 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ12.2%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3065.2%E1532.6%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 46 of the 118 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F7613×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5842×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Greenville Gardens, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Apr 11, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's safety while smoking. Resident #1 was allowed to sit on a public roadway in a space used by cars to parallel park where he could have been injured in a vehicle and pedestrian accident. An IJ was identified on 4/09/2024 at 3:45 PM. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 4:49 PM. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF697Dec 8, 2021

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to residents who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences, for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #64) reviewed for pain management. The facility did not provide Resident #68 with her available and ordered pain medication during an episode of acute pain on 12/6/21. As a result, Resident #68 suffered severe pain for at least an approximate hour. This failure could place residents at risk for unnecessary pain, discomfort and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of the physician order [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF755Aug 13, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of receipt of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable accurate reconciliation and determine that drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs were maintained and periodically reconciled for 1 of 1 storage area reviewed for expired and discontinued medications. The facility failed to keep a record of receipt of controlled medications awaiting disposition to allow accurate and periodic reconciliation. This failure could place residents at risk for loss of prescribed medications, residents' safety, and drug diversion. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Aug 13, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #20 and Resident #11) reviewed for infection control. 1.The facility failed to ensure staff wore PPE when entering Resident #20's room on 08/12/25 and 08/13/25 who was on contact isolation for Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase also known as ESBL (a group of bacteria that are resistant to many commonly used antibiotics. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN F used proper hand hygiene when preforming blood sugar checks and given insulin for Resident #11 on 08/12/25. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF925Aug 13, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for the memory care unit. The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the memory care unit was free of gnats and other flying insects. This could place residents at risk for an unsanitary environment. Findings include:During an observation and attempted interview on 8/11/25 at 10:18 a.m., Resident #70 had gnats in her water cup that was at her bedside. There were also gnats flying around the room. Resident #70 resided on the locked unit. During an observation and attempted interview on 8/11/25 at 10:20 a.m. Resident #64 was standing inside his room watching the TV. He did not answer any questions. […]

Read 30 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 30 of 118 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 13, 2025Standard10 findings
  • Jun 19, 2024Complaint4 findings
  • Jun 5, 2024Standard9 findings
  • Apr 11, 2024Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 13, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 1, 2023Standard and complaint20 findings
  • Dec 8, 2021Standard9 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 14, 2021Complaint1 finding
Show the 20 earlier surveys
  • Sep 24, 2021Complaint3 findings
  • Jan 2, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Sep 10, 2020Complaint7 findings
  • Feb 11, 2020Complaint4 findings · 3 harm
  • Oct 5, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 15, 2019Standard and complaint6 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 22, 2018Complaint3 findings
  • May 17, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 16, 2018Standard6 findings
  • Mar 8, 2017Complaint4 findings · 4 harm
  • Feb 1, 2017Standard3 findings
  • Jul 12, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 21, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Feb 19, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Feb 14, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Mar 22, 2013—3 findings
  • Mar 15, 2012—4 findings
  • Jan 6, 2012—2 findings
  • Mar 11, 2011—5 findings
  • Sep 24, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction