Deficiency Index

Windmill Village Rehabilitation & Care Center

Lubbock, Texas · CCN 676318

32 surveys since 2012, 12 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
117
Surveys
32
Harm or worse
12
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2012–2026
’12’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file22/32

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
Government - Hospital district
Chain
PRIORITY MANAGEMENT
County
Lubbock
Medicare-certified since
2012
Ownership changed
In the last 12 months

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
1
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 104 government-run facilities of 100–127 beds in Texas.

Last survey on record

Jul 9, 2026

123 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.113.25
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.43—
Annual nurse turnover61.6%48.1%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1240.0%E1756.7%F13.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 30 of the 117 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8804×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5502×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5832×

    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.

  • F5852×

    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Windmill Village Rehabilitation & Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF580Mar 24, 2023

    Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately consult the physician and/or inform the Resident/Responsible Party (RP) when there was a change of condition for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for notification of changes. (Residents #1) The facility failed to consult the physician, emergency services, or responsible party that Resident #1 had a significant drop in oxygen saturation levels of 31% throughout three shifts. This failure could place residents at risk of not having notifications made for health-related issues and could hinder resident treatment, even causing death. An IJ was identified on [DATE] at 5:00 PM. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:30 PM. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF684Mar 24, 2023

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) by failing to contact physician or emergency services, to provide medical attention for Resident #1's declining oxygen saturation levels. 1.) The facility failed to contact the physician or emergency services after Resident #1 was found to have a decrease in oxygen saturation levels and possibly causing death. Resident #1 was only sent to the hospital after family member intervened and requested Resident #1 to seek medical attention because of Resident #1's decrease and unstable oxygen saturation levels. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 12, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services. 1) The facility failed to protect foods from potential contamination. 2) The facility failed to ensure foods were not expired. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. The findings included: - The following observation was made during a kitchen tour on [DATE] that began at 10:00 AM and concluded at 10:35 AM: -An opened bag of potato chips on the counter, open date [DATE]. -An opened bag od bologna in the fridge, open date [DATE]. -an opened gallon jug of milk in the fridge, best by [DATE]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Jul 9, 2026

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to treat residents with respect, dignity, and care in a manner and in an environment that promotes the maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 11 of 11 confidential residents in that: The facility failed to ensure staff were not utilizing their personal cell phones while providing care, which included assisting residents with their showers and performing peri-care. The deficient practice could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life, loss of dignity and self-worth. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jul 9, 2026

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services, in that: The facility failed to ensure the fryer was free of build up and grime. The facility failed to ensure the toaster was free of build-up and grime. The facility failed to ensure the wall behind the dishwashing station was free of build-up and grime.The facility failed to ensure hot holding pans/cookie sheets were free of build-up and grime.The facility failed to ensure all canned food items had expiration or use-by dates. The facility failed to ensure all pantry food items had expiration or use-by dates. […]

Read 32 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 32 of 117 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 9, 2026Standard3 findings
  • Nov 25, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 29, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • May 20, 2025Standard10 findings
  • Feb 27, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 9, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 12, 2024Standard9 findings
  • Mar 27, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 24 earlier surveys
  • Jan 11, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 24, 2023Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Mar 8, 2023Standard2 findings
  • Jan 28, 2022Standard1 finding
  • Oct 15, 2020Standard1 finding
  • Nov 15, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 8, 2019Complaint8 findings · 6 harm
  • Apr 4, 2019Standard and complaint1 finding
  • Oct 4, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 9, 2018Standard5 findings
  • Feb 16, 2017Standard7 findings
  • Jun 16, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • May 5, 2016Standard7 findings
  • Apr 29, 2015Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Jan 22, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 3, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 6, 2014Standard and complaint26 findings
  • May 28, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 24, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 25, 2014—2 findings
  • Jan 28, 2014—1 finding
  • Aug 29, 2013—4 findings
  • Jun 11, 2013—4 findings · 4 harm
  • Sep 7, 2012—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction