University Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing
Bronx, New York · CCN 335061
11 surveys since 2010, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 37
- Surveys
- 11
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 46
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- CENTERS HEALTH CARE
- County
- Bronx
- Medicare-certified since
- 1969
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=12, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Mar 25, 2026
229 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.60 | 3.60 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.63 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 25.6% | 48.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1184.6% | E215.4% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at University Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF803May 7, 2024
Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 5/1/2024 to 5/7/2024, the facility did not ensure that resident menus were followed, and food preferences were honored. This was evident for 4 (Residents #38, # 95, and # 4) of 12 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1) Residents #38, #95, and #4 did not receive food items listed on their lunch and dinner meal ticket, and 2) Resident #38 did not receive preferred food items as requested. The findings are: The facility policy titled Tray Assembly Identification and Service Policy that was last reviewed in January 2024 documented tickets are used to identify correct items for resident diet and are placed at resident place setting or on tray. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812May 7, 2024
Based on observation, record review, and interview, during the Recertification Survey from [DATE] to [DATE], the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and distributed in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was evident during the kitchen observation. Specifically, 1.) multiple food items were observed in the refrigerators without proper labeling, 2.) opened food items were not dated, 3.) expired food items were observed, and 4.) food was not stored away from rust or soiled surfaces. The findings are: A facility policy and procedure titled Food Storage which was last revised on [DATE] stated that food will be stored in an area that is clean, dry and free from contaminants. All stock must be rotated with each new order received. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF641Mar 25, 2026
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility did not ensure that assessments accurately reflected the residents' status. This was evident for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #3) reviewed for Respiratory Care out of forty-six (46) sampled residents. Specifically, The Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment did not document Resident #3 was in use of continuous oxygen. The findings are: Resident #3 had diagnoses upon admission that included Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and bipolar disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented that the resident's cognitive status was severely impaired. The Minimum Data Set assessment did not document that the resident was use of continuous oxygen at the time of assessment. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF695Mar 25, 2026
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility did not ensure that residents received necessary respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive care plan. This was evident for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #3) reviewed for Respiratory Care out of forty-six (46) sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #3 was observed receiving oxygen via nasal cannula at a rate of four (4) liters per minute when the Physician's Order was written for oxygen to be received at a rate of two (2) liters per minute. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF842Mar 25, 2026
Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure that the resident medical records were accurately documented in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was evident for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #50) reviewed for Closed Records out of forty-six (46) total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #50 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE], but the resident's medical record revealed that the resident was seen on 03/12/2026 and 03/19/2026 by behavioral health staff despite not having returned to the facility. The findings are: Resident #50 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included non-Alzheimer's dementia, depression, heart failure, and diabetes mellitus. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 37 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 25, 2026Standard3 findings
- May 7, 2024Standard4 findings
- Nov 22, 2022Standard and complaint5 findings
- Jan 22, 2020Standard1 finding
- Jul 23, 2018Standard2 findings
- May 5, 2017Standard1 finding
- Mar 4, 2016Standard1 finding
- Feb 13, 2015Standard2 findings
Show the 3 earlier surveys
- Dec 26, 2013—1 finding
- Dec 1, 2011—13 findings
- Dec 31, 2010—4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Sapphire Nursing And Rehab At GoshenGoshenno harm findings
- Woodside Manor Nursing Home IncRochesterno harm findings
- Absolut Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation at AAllegany1 harm finding
- John T Mather Memorial Hosp T C UPort Jeffersonno harm findings
- New Glen Oaks Nursing Home, IncGlen Oaksno harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction