Deficiency Index

University Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing

Bronx, New York · CCN 335061

11 surveys since 2010, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
37
Surveys
11
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file7/11

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
46
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
CENTERS HEALTH CARE
County
Bronx
Medicare-certified since
1969

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=12, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Mar 25, 2026

229 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.603.60
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.63—
Annual nurse turnover25.6%48.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1184.6%E215.4%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 13 of the 37 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at University Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF803May 7, 2024

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 5/1/2024 to 5/7/2024, the facility did not ensure that resident menus were followed, and food preferences were honored. This was evident for 4 (Residents #38, # 95, and # 4) of 12 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1) Residents #38, #95, and #4 did not receive food items listed on their lunch and dinner meal ticket, and 2) Resident #38 did not receive preferred food items as requested. The findings are: The facility policy titled Tray Assembly Identification and Service Policy that was last reviewed in January 2024 documented tickets are used to identify correct items for resident diet and are placed at resident place setting or on tray. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812May 7, 2024

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, during the Recertification Survey from [DATE] to [DATE], the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and distributed in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was evident during the kitchen observation. Specifically, 1.) multiple food items were observed in the refrigerators without proper labeling, 2.) opened food items were not dated, 3.) expired food items were observed, and 4.) food was not stored away from rust or soiled surfaces. The findings are: A facility policy and procedure titled Food Storage which was last revised on [DATE] stated that food will be stored in an area that is clean, dry and free from contaminants. All stock must be rotated with each new order received. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF641Mar 25, 2026

    Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility did not ensure that assessments accurately reflected the residents' status. This was evident for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #3) reviewed for Respiratory Care out of forty-six (46) sampled residents. Specifically, The Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment did not document Resident #3 was in use of continuous oxygen. The findings are: Resident #3 had diagnoses upon admission that included Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and bipolar disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented that the resident's cognitive status was severely impaired. The Minimum Data Set assessment did not document that the resident was use of continuous oxygen at the time of assessment. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF695Mar 25, 2026

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility did not ensure that residents received necessary respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive care plan. This was evident for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #3) reviewed for Respiratory Care out of forty-six (46) sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #3 was observed receiving oxygen via nasal cannula at a rate of four (4) liters per minute when the Physician's Order was written for oxygen to be received at a rate of two (2) liters per minute. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF842Mar 25, 2026

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure that the resident medical records were accurately documented in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was evident for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #50) reviewed for Closed Records out of forty-six (46) total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #50 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE], but the resident's medical record revealed that the resident was seen on 03/12/2026 and 03/19/2026 by behavioral health staff despite not having returned to the facility. The findings are: Resident #50 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included non-Alzheimer's dementia, depression, heart failure, and diabetes mellitus. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 37 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 25, 2026Standard3 findings
  • May 7, 2024Standard4 findings
  • Nov 22, 2022Standard and complaint5 findings
  • Jan 22, 2020Standard1 finding
  • Jul 23, 2018Standard2 findings
  • May 5, 2017Standard1 finding
  • Mar 4, 2016Standard1 finding
  • Feb 13, 2015Standard2 findings
Show the 3 earlier surveys
  • Dec 26, 2013—1 finding
  • Dec 1, 2011—13 findings
  • Dec 31, 2010—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction